2016
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1153355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of regulations on overheating risk in dwellings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Chicago and Denver, the difference is about 12% at both SOC and MOC. Given the consistency of the results, similar to previous European and Australian studies , Ren et al 2014, Mulville and Stravoravdis 2016 we infer that, in general, building energy codes that are developed to make buildings more efficient by 'preventing wintertime heat escape', limit the ability of buildings to passively cool through loss of heat via air exchange and conduction through exterior surfaces. However, Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For example, in Chicago and Denver, the difference is about 12% at both SOC and MOC. Given the consistency of the results, similar to previous European and Australian studies , Ren et al 2014, Mulville and Stravoravdis 2016 we infer that, in general, building energy codes that are developed to make buildings more efficient by 'preventing wintertime heat escape', limit the ability of buildings to passively cool through loss of heat via air exchange and conduction through exterior surfaces. However, Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Current and new regulations to reducing energy consumption, especially in cold climates, could affect the overheating risks in dwellings, which Mulville and Stravoravdis [55] have investigated. Through building simulation, each building structure is considered based on how it thermally will perform under current and future climate change predictions.…”
Section: Overheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a limitation that future research studies should take into consideration. The study's selected two categories are commonly studied in the evaluation of health-related studies for housing (Anttila et al, 2013;Becker & Paciuk, 2009;Broderick et al, 2017;Du et al, 2015;Green, 1999;Haverinen-Shaughnessy et al, 2018;Hopton & Hunt, 1996;Iversen et al, 1986;Mulville & Stravoravdis, 2016;Thomson et al, 2001) as well as other building typologies or mainly on the topic of indoor environments (Fisk, 2015;Hänninen & Asikainen, 2013;Hedge et al, 1992;Lefèbver et al, 2011;Mitchell et al, 2007;Parsons, 2002;Spengler, 2012;Vardoulakis et al, 2015;Wargocki et al, 2009). The other data that is not collected in this study is 'ambient data', which could have helped to portray a better overview of the indoor environment conditions (Jeong et al, 2019;Nasir & Colbeck, 2013;Nasruddin et al, 2019;Salthammer et al, 2018) and their impacts on human health.…”
Section: Defining Parameters For Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%