The Impact of the Digital Divide on the Adoption of e-Government in Greece

Abstract

The adoption of e-government services and the active e-participation of citizens may be affected by the pre-dominant socio-economic inequalities. The current study examined the impact of the digital divide to the use of e-government and e-participation services. We used the micro-data from the national survey on the use of Information and Communication Technologies by the Greek households and individuals. This survey was conducted by the Greek Statistical Authority in 2017, in a representative sample of the Greek population (n = 3321). We analyzed the data using logistic regression equations. According to the results, the social exclusion factors may influence the use of e-government services. The most important socio-economic factors affecting the decision to use e-government services are the educational level, age and citizenship. The e-participation of the citizens in various democratic processes is only influenced by their educational attainment. This work highlights the impact of the digital divide to every aspect of our digital life. The state should implement policies to address the digital divide focusing on the vulnerable social subgroups, such as the low-educated and older people. The findings of our research may help the policymakers to conceptualize the effect of the digital divide to e-government adoption, in a multidimensional and integrative way.
 Keywords: e-government, Greece, digital divide, e-services, digital skills

Barriers to employing e-participation in the Iranian planning system

“…Moreover, six interviewees argued that planning authorities might not be confident regarding the effectiveness of e-participation practices in achieving their claimed objectives. For example, one of the interviewed planners reiterated commonly cited issues surrounding the digital divide reiterating one of the most commonly cited barriers to e-participation in the literature (Gounopoulos et al, 2020, Maia Ribeiro et al, 2018, Saebø et al, 2008. Interviewees argued that e-participation might not be the most inclusive form of public participation, referring to low-income households, people living in informal settlements, and people with lower levels of electronic literacy.…”

“…Mirroring this, empirical studies show that citizens are wary to participate in e-participation where they feel their voices are likely to be ignored, or meaningfully engaged with by planning authorities (Cleland et al, 2012(Cleland et al, , Åström et al, 2013. Critically, citizen engagement with e-participation is primarily driven by their access to ICTs that would enable their participation, and the skills needed to use such ICTs (Maia Ribeiro et al, 2018, Gounopoulos et al, 2020.…”

Expert opinion on the implementation of e-government efforts to improve village apparatus performance in Indonesia

“…In addition, the level of education is another factor that affects the implementation of e-government (Seljan et al, 2020). According to Hargittai and Hinnant six, the tendency of e-government users to come from people with a high level of education is because they have a greater interest in government issues than groups with lower secondary education levels (Gounopoulos et al, 2020). Differences in Interests between Citizens and Government Governments and citizens have different goals when using egovernment.…”

Türkiye’de E-Devlet Hizmetlerinin Kullanımını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Analizi

“…Yaşlı insanlar internet teknolojileri ile büyümemiş oldukları için internete aşina değildirler. Ayrıca internet oldukça karmaşıktır ve yaşlılar gençlerden daha yavaş öğrenme eğilimindedirler (Gounopoulos, Kontogiannis, Kazanidis, & Valsamidis, 2019).…”

“…Eğitim düzeyi, e-devlet kullanımının çok önemli bir belirleyicisidir. İyi eğitimli olan kişilerin interneti tüm e-devlet faaliyetleri için kullanma olasılığı daha yüksektir (Gounopoulos, Kontogiannis, Kazanidis, & Valsamidis, 2019). Bireylerin cinsiyetinin e-devlet kullanım durumlarının hepsinde anlamlı olduğu görülmektedir.…”