2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1501_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Crew Resource Management Behaviors in Mission Performance: Implications for Training Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens thanks to conditions such as the attribution of roles, shared mental models and feedback. These features are obtained from the skills developed in Crew Resource Management (CRM), which improves performance and reduces human error in teams, such as in aviation crews (Nullmeyer and Spiker, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens thanks to conditions such as the attribution of roles, shared mental models and feedback. These features are obtained from the skills developed in Crew Resource Management (CRM), which improves performance and reduces human error in teams, such as in aviation crews (Nullmeyer and Spiker, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Kirkpatrick's (1996) framework for evaluating training effectiveness (reactions, learning, behavior, and results) was used. Kirkpatrick's evaluation hierarchy is a way to structure and establish a framework for evaluating the impact of training on an organization (Safety Regulation Group, 2002) and has traditionally been followed by many other human factors training evaluation studies (Nullmeyer & Spike, 2003). Kirkpatrick emphasizes four different levels of evaluation (Kirkpatrick, 1996) …”
Section: Evaluation Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, some type of student-user critique serves as the data source in Level 1 whereas a pre/posttest comparison of KSA acquisition is the modal technique for Level II (Nullmeyer & Spiker, 2003). From a research standpoint, Level III is the defining feature of effectiveness, as demonstrated by a positive transfer of training to the job (flying) environment.…”
Section: Summative Evaluation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%