2016
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Methodological Meta-Analyses and a Call to Assess Current and Former Drinking Patterns: A Commentary on Stockwell et al. (2016)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have expressed concern that former drinkers have been misclassified in past research as alcohol abstainers (Fillmore et al, 2007;Greenfield, 2016;Stockwell et al, 2016). In this U.K. cohort born in 1958 and now in midlife, the latent class analyses did not reveal a group of long-term alcohol abstainers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Scholars have expressed concern that former drinkers have been misclassified in past research as alcohol abstainers (Fillmore et al, 2007;Greenfield, 2016;Stockwell et al, 2016). In this U.K. cohort born in 1958 and now in midlife, the latent class analyses did not reveal a group of long-term alcohol abstainers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Connor (2016) highlights well-substantiated concerns over the validity of conclusions based on observational longitudinal studies of health in general, noting instances in which randomized controlled trials have disconfirmed conclusions based on meta-analysis of cohort studies (e.g., hormone replacement therapy). Greenfield (2016) notes how few cohort studies on the link between alcohol use and mortality take account of the patterning of drinking, whether over weeks, months, or a lifetime. Rehm et al (2016) suggest that although analysis of alcohol and all-cause mortality from published studies holds interest especially at a political level, in practice they recommend different types of studies on which to base estimates of the global burden of disease and low-risk drinking guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%