2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2021.100502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (in)stability of Bayesian model selection criteria in disease mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although here DIC and WAIC calculated with R-INLA and NIMBLE show very small differences and clearly point towards the model with a Type IV interaction, Vranks et al 34 warn about disparities among model selection criteria values provided by different software packages. Differences may be due to software-specific posterior samples or softwarespecific calculations of the model selection statistics.…”
Section: Spanish Breast Cancer Mortality Datamentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although here DIC and WAIC calculated with R-INLA and NIMBLE show very small differences and clearly point towards the model with a Type IV interaction, Vranks et al 34 warn about disparities among model selection criteria values provided by different software packages. Differences may be due to software-specific posterior samples or softwarespecific calculations of the model selection statistics.…”
Section: Spanish Breast Cancer Mortality Datamentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Table 2 displays the values of the DIC and the WAIC together with the mean deviance (D(θ)) and the effective number of parameters (p D ) for the spatio-temporal models with the ICAR and BYM spatial priors, the two forms of including the RW1 in NIMBLE, Nimble 1 and Nimble 2, the four types of interaction, and the set of hyperpriors H1 (results for hyperpriors H2 and H3 are shown in Tables A.1 and A.2 respectively in the Supplementary Materials). In general, DIC and WAIC values that differ by less than five point towards the same model (see for example Vranks et al 34 ). According to these criteria, the ICAR and BYM spatial priors lead to very similar results, and the Type IV interaction is preferred over the others.…”
Section: Spanish Breast Cancer Mortality Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The variables age and gender have significant effects, while the interaction effect between age and gender is not significant. Leaving out the interaction term gives similar model results which shows robustness in terms of model fit, and a very small difference in WAIC estimates is observed, leading to no clear support for the model with or without the interaction term (Vranckx et al., 2021 ). Therefore, we here present the model with the interaction term between age and gender due to the primary purpose of using the age and gender variable as confounding variables in this epidemiological process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, we investigated which random‐effects structure performs better when prediction is the objective using the LMPL (log marginal predictive likelihood; Geisser & Eddy, 1979 ). Only very small differences between the LMPL estimates of the different options were noticed, which were too small to prefer a single structure (Vranckx et al., 2021 ). Hence, based on the WAIC, this section gives the results of the model where the processes generating the confirmed cases and symptoms are linked via a bivariate spatial correlation, in addition to a univariate normal uncorrelated heterogeneity term for the symptoms' processes and a gamma uncorrelated heterogeneity term for the confirmed cases' process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the same PI coverage, the model with the smaller MIS has less uncertainty [12]. In addition, goodness-of-fit of models are compared using WAIC, with smaller values (difference larger than 5) corresponding to a better fitting model [26,27]. Figure 3 presents the 5-day ahead predictions for the number of new hospitalisations at different phases of the epidemic.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%