1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1986.tb01813.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The indirect estimation of the digestibility in cattle of herbage from Belgian permanent pasture

Abstract: Relationships between herbage organic matter digestibility measured in vivo, and faecal nitrogen concentration were determined. Measurements of in vivo digestibility were made on twenty-nine herbages, cut from mixed improved permanent pastures with Lolium perenne as the predominant grass and offered ad libitum to cattle. The faecal nitrogen index predicted the herbage digestibility with good accuracy, and the equations obtained should have application for such determinations on Belgian pastures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover it was more reliable when used at pasture to predict OMD and OMI from CPf and faecal output for heifers grazing the same grass. There are fewer published hyperbolic models (Lancaster 1949;Wehausen 1995) than linear or quadratic models predicting OMD from CPf (Langlands et al 1963;Greenhalgh et al 1966;Streeter 1969;Thomas & Campling 1976;Barthiaux-Thill & Oger 1986). However, the hyperbolic model may be based on a biological relationship between digestibility and metabolic faecal protein (MFP), as first proposed by Lancaster (1949).…”
Section: Om Digestibility Prediction From Cpf Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover it was more reliable when used at pasture to predict OMD and OMI from CPf and faecal output for heifers grazing the same grass. There are fewer published hyperbolic models (Lancaster 1949;Wehausen 1995) than linear or quadratic models predicting OMD from CPf (Langlands et al 1963;Greenhalgh et al 1966;Streeter 1969;Thomas & Campling 1976;Barthiaux-Thill & Oger 1986). However, the hyperbolic model may be based on a biological relationship between digestibility and metabolic faecal protein (MFP), as first proposed by Lancaster (1949).…”
Section: Om Digestibility Prediction From Cpf Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, body condition scoring (BCS) enables an estimation of the individual animal's health and dietary situation by assessing muscular and fatty deposits in a rapid, non-invasive way [20]. Second, the digestibility of organic matter (OMD) and the faecal carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio derived from faecal N and organic matter (OM) are common indicators for the nutritional and energy value of ingested feed [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The prediction of feed organic matter digestibility (OMD) is based on a direct relationship between feed-N and faecal N [22,23,28,29].…”
Section: Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foi observado que a excreção de N de origem endógena, estimada como a concentração total de N menos o N presente na fibra em detergente neutro, representou 77±7% do N fecal total, e que a excreção de ambos, N total e N endógeno, foi variável como proporção do peso vivo dos animais (médias±desvio padrão de 193±61 e 150±51 mg/kg de peso vivo, respectivamente). Em função disto, foi observado uma precisão com base na concentração fecal de indicadores, como o nitrogênio (Lancaster, 1949;Bartiaux-Thill & Oger, 1986;Comeron & Peyraud, 1993, Boval et al, 1996Lukas et al, 2005). Esta técnica assume que o teor de N nas fezes varia inversamente à quantidade de matéria seca fecal excretada (Demarquilly et al, baixa relação entre concentração fecal de N e digestibilidade da MO (Figura 8).…”
Section: Estimativa Da Digestibilidade a Partir De Amostras Da Forragemunclassified
“…A MSi, FDAi e FDNi, por sua vez, têm sido mais frequentemente testados e utilizados. O grau de recuperação e, deste modo, a precisão e exatidão das estimativas de digestibilidade e consumo utilizando estes indicadores tem sido variável (Berchielli et al, 2005;Rodrigues et al, 2006). Isto ocorre porque estas frações não constituem unidades químicas uniformes e constantes em todos os alimentos, e tampouco há um método padrão definido para sua determinação (Lippke, 2002).…”
Section: A) B)unclassified