2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inefficiency of Bitcoin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

29
458
3
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,090 publications
(498 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
29
458
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In the chart of USD, the Hurst exponent of price is greater than 0.5 before 2014 and wanders around 0.5 after 2014, which means USD-denominated Bitcoin is in the process of moving efficiently. This evidence supports the conclusion of Urquhart [14] and Bariviera [15]. The price Hurst exponent of RUB is less than 0.5.…”
Section: Rolling Window Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the chart of USD, the Hurst exponent of price is greater than 0.5 before 2014 and wanders around 0.5 after 2014, which means USD-denominated Bitcoin is in the process of moving efficiently. This evidence supports the conclusion of Urquhart [14] and Bariviera [15]. The price Hurst exponent of RUB is less than 0.5.…”
Section: Rolling Window Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Urquhart [14] uses several tests to test the inefficiency of Bitcoin and finds that while Bitcoin is not efficient, it is in the process of becoming effective. Bariviera [15] employs a dynamic detrended fluctuation analysis approach to support Urquhart's conclusion and finds that the volatility of Bitcoin has long-term memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concluded that the order of magnitude of the energy power is 100 MW. Moreover, we can cite the work by Urquhart [9], who evaluated the economic performance of the Bitcoin system inferring that bitcoin returns are insufficient to cover the energy expenditure of mining operations. Previously, Hayes [10] describe the cost of production of one bitcoin, and O'Dwyer and Malone [11] analysed the bitcoin production cost until 2014 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouri et al (2016) examine persistence in the level and volatility of Bitcoin using both parametric and semiparametric techniques; they detect long memory in both measures of volatility considered (absolute and squared returns). Catania and Grassi (2017) provide further evidence of long memory in the cryptocurrency market, whilst Urquhart (2016) using the R/S Hurst exponent obtains strong evidence of anti-persistence, which indicates non-randomness of Bitcoin returns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheung et al (2015), Dwyer (2014), Bouoiyour and Selmi (2015) and Carrick (2016) show that this market is much more volatile than others. Halaburda and Gandal (2014) analyse its degree of competitiveness Urquhart (2016) and Bartos (2015) focus on efficiency finding evidence for and against respectively. Anomalies in the cryptocurrency market are examined by Kurihara and Fukushima (2017) and Caporale and Plastun (2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%