2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00518.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Booms and Busts in the U.S. Economy on the Interstate Migration System

Abstract: Migration flows around the U.S. have shown a great deal of temporal and geographical differentiation over the past few decades. However, the recent downturn in the U.S. economy provides a renewed motivation to explore the relationship between the macro-economy and interstate migration. To address this issue, in this paper patterns of interstate migration are analyzed using IRS data and several migration efficiency measures for 18 2-year time periods, 1988-2006. Included in the analysis is an examination of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope interaction coefficient is positive and significant for each time period except 2008-2009 and 2009-2010. In other words, outside of this two-year window, net migration gains by the U.S.born in large metropolitan areas generated more gain in the immigrant population through internal migration than in small metropolitan areas. In -2010 we detect no such effect.…”
Section: Internal Migration the Redistribution Of Immigrants To New contrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slope interaction coefficient is positive and significant for each time period except 2008-2009 and 2009-2010. In other words, outside of this two-year window, net migration gains by the U.S.born in large metropolitan areas generated more gain in the immigrant population through internal migration than in small metropolitan areas. In -2010 we detect no such effect.…”
Section: Internal Migration the Redistribution Of Immigrants To New contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Our main interest is in the redistributive impacts of migration on immigrant settlement. As net migration volumes are heavily influenced by population size, we base much of our analysis on a well-known measure, migration effectiveness, which standardizes migration gains or losses per 100 movers (e.g., Vias, 2010). This makes it possible to compare the redistribution of differently sized population subgroups across locations of varying populations.…”
Section: Data and Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a positive relation between economic freedom and growth (Ashby et al 2013;Panahi et al 2014). In turn, higher growth is usually perceived as a migration determinant (Vias 2010) and a pull factor (Lee 1966). If, then, higher economic freedom can be viewed as a direct cause of higher economic growth, which in turn positively impacts migration flow, then economic freedom also indirectly affects migration (Hall, Lawson 2014).…”
Section: Economic Freedom and Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared trends in native‐born black and white migration patterns for individual states or aggregated into census divisions and regions using two measures: raw net migration and a standardized measure of net migration called migration effectiveness (e.g., Vias ). Migration effectiveness, E ik , for group k in geographic unit i (census region, division, state) was calculated using the following formula: E i k = 100 I n i k O u t i k I n i k + O u t i k where In ik and Out ik refer to the migration flows of group k in and out of geographic unit i.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%