2005
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of functional groups of self‐assembled monolayers on fibrous capsule formation and cell recruitment

Abstract: The contribution of the surface chemistry of an implant to the thickness of the fibrous capsule formed after implantation was herein investigated. For that, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkanethiols on gold with different terminal functional groups (COOH, OH, and CH(3)) were used. These surfaces were implanted in subcutaneous air pouches of BALB/c mice and the ensuing fibrous capsules were evaluated and compared with the initial inflammatory response caused by the implant. The thickness of the fibrous c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slight increase in the water contact angle for HPG-P3-grafted surface compared to HPG-P2 may due to the presence of more amount of less hydrophilic carboxyl groups connected via ester on HPG-P3. This observation is supported by the reports by Barbosa et al (2005) and Martin et al (2003) that the water contact angles of surfaces grafted with OH terminal polymers were lower than the corresponding COOH terminal polymer. The difference between HPG-P1 and HPG-P2 is due the difference in the molecular weight of the polymer.…”
Section: Polymer Coating and Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A slight increase in the water contact angle for HPG-P3-grafted surface compared to HPG-P2 may due to the presence of more amount of less hydrophilic carboxyl groups connected via ester on HPG-P3. This observation is supported by the reports by Barbosa et al (2005) and Martin et al (2003) that the water contact angles of surfaces grafted with OH terminal polymers were lower than the corresponding COOH terminal polymer. The difference between HPG-P1 and HPG-P2 is due the difference in the molecular weight of the polymer.…”
Section: Polymer Coating and Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The inflammatory response to implantable devices is greatly influenced by the material surface chemistry, as demonstrated previously by others [5] and us [6][7][8][9]. Using self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) we demonstrated that methyl-terminated SAMs cause early inflammatory cell recruitment in vivo [8], more polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) than mononuclear cells [9] and the formation of thicker fibrous capsules around implanted materials [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Surface functionality has been shown to affect cell:particle interactions [22]. Although it has been suggested that surface functionality should be the determining factor concerning cell uptake and subsequent activity inside the cell [46], studies that have varied surface functionality to investigate membrane binding, uptake, and internalization of nanoparticles are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously noted, the available literature on this subject shows some conflicting results. Since a significant body of recent literature documents the fact that surface functionality affects the interactions between particles and cells [21][22], we have undertaken a comprehensive study to examine the effects of varying surface functional groups on TiO 2 :cell interactions under non-photolytic conditions. For this study, TiO 2 nanoparticles having different surface chemistries were produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%