2003
DOI: 10.1078/0031-4056-00237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of mineral solubility and soil solution concentration on the toxicity of copper to Eisenia fetida Savigny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2C). This is in agreement with the observations in artificial soils of Arnold et al (2003), Currie et al (2005) and Langdon et al (2005). Earthworm reproduction was a greatly decreased in the field soils with pH values lower than 5.9, such as F0, F1, F3 and B0 (Table 1; Fig.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Biological Responses and Physicochesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…2C). This is in agreement with the observations in artificial soils of Arnold et al (2003), Currie et al (2005) and Langdon et al (2005). Earthworm reproduction was a greatly decreased in the field soils with pH values lower than 5.9, such as F0, F1, F3 and B0 (Table 1; Fig.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Biological Responses and Physicochesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PHEs are present in soil bound to soil fractions with different solubility and chemical characteristics. Consequently, they may have different toxic effects on organisms (Rieuwerts et al 1998;Rodriguez et al 1999;Oomen et al 2000;Arnold et al 2003;Geebelen et al 2003;Krishnamurti and Naidu 2008;Buccolieri et al 2010). The risk posed by contaminated soils to human health depends on the potential of the PHEs to leave the soil and enter the human bloodstream (Wragg and Cave 2002).…”
Section: Assessment Of Phes In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ecotoxicological effects of soil extracts as a source http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.01.005 0045-6535/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. of secondary soil pollution have been evaluated using algae, plants, ciliates, bacteria, and waterfleas in prior studies (Thomas et al, 1990;Bowers et al, 1997;Hammel et al, 1998;Ronnpagel et al, 1998;Power and de Pomerai, 1999;Romkens et al, 1999;Shen and Shen, 2001;Tiensing et al, 2001;Baun et al, 2002;Cook et al, 2002;Arnold et al, 2003;Aruoja et al, 2004;Robidoux et al, 2004;Loureiro et al, 2005;Antunes et al, 2010;Ore et al, 2010;Maderova et al, 2011;Maisto et al, 2011;Marques et al, 2011;Miranda et al, 2011). When these studies were conducted, representative freshwater algae (e.g., Chlorella vulgaris, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, and Scenedesmus subspicatus) were mainly used to evaluate the effects of soil extracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%