2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2014
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2014.581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Organizational Factors on Inter-team Knowledge Sharing Effectiveness in Agile Environments

Abstract: Agile software development is known by focusing on interaction among team members to share knowledge. However, little guidance is provided to encourage interaction across agile teams. Based on a preliminary conceptual model, this paper examines influencing factors, such as organizational strategy, and communication flow and channels, regarding inter-team knowledge sharing (KS) effectiveness in agile environments. We analyze the characteristics and the influence of the mentioned factors through a survey researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hsu et al (2012) afirmam que a comunicação consiste no processo de transferência de informações entre os membros da equipe. Santos et al (2014) argumentam que a comunicação flui da fonte para o receptor, resultando em transferência e compreensão de um significado" e complementa, apoiando-se em Dierkes et al (2003), que este processo só é efetivo se o destinatário puder absorver o conteúdo da mensagem e utilizá-lo. Thissen et al (2007) e Staton (2017), afirmam que quando a comunicação é realizada ineficazmente prejudica o andamento das ações de rotina e cria conflitos entre as equipes de software.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hsu et al (2012) afirmam que a comunicação consiste no processo de transferência de informações entre os membros da equipe. Santos et al (2014) argumentam que a comunicação flui da fonte para o receptor, resultando em transferência e compreensão de um significado" e complementa, apoiando-se em Dierkes et al (2003), que este processo só é efetivo se o destinatário puder absorver o conteúdo da mensagem e utilizá-lo. Thissen et al (2007) e Staton (2017), afirmam que quando a comunicação é realizada ineficazmente prejudica o andamento das ações de rotina e cria conflitos entre as equipes de software.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…De acordo com Misnevs e Demiray (2017), lacunas na comunicação geram problemas que afetam a entrega de produtos e serviços aos clientes. As tarefas podem ser erroneamente alocadas e, consequentemente, mal realizadas prejudicando tempo, custo e esforço relacionados ao desenvolvimento de software [Santos et al, 2014;Schmidt e Meures, 2016;Rutz e Tanner, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Recently Companies are considering the factor of sharing information for successful implementation of agile projects [6]. Different organizational work practices of sharing knowledge affect the agility practice in software development industry so it's certainly very much important that affective practices should be employed [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In software projects, the Knowledge Spiral framework is applied every day, especially on Agile projects [46]. Dorairaj [20] and Santos [58], for example, investigated how teams collect, store, and share knowledge. Both studies share the same view: software development is a suitable environment for tacit knowledge sharing among teams, mainly because of the focus on face-to-face team interaction and pair programming.…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menolli et al [38] claimed that companies should build conditions that motivate information sharing and knowledge dissemination; otherwise, valuable information could be internalized only on the mind of the employees. All these studies show that disseminating knowledge is a fundamental competence for an organization in general, particularly software companies [21,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%