The influence of scientific creativity and critical worksheets (SCCW) on creative thinking skills and critical scientific as well as students’ cognitive abilities on project-based learning work and energy concepts

Wulansari, Rini; Rusnayati, Heni; Saepuzaman, Duden; Karim, Saeful; Feranie, Selly

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052039

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(4) Adaptive Learning Pathways Future students should not only actively learn knowledge and master key skills. It is more important to be able to transform knowledge and skills into higher-order cognitive abilities, critical thinking, and innovative and creative talents in their social lives [85,86]. Therefore, providing adaptive learning pathways for students' competency development should be considered an important pathway to meet future challenges and enhance national educational strength and civic literacy.…”

Section: Foundations Of Intelligent Education Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intelligent education research has become a research hotspot in recent years. The Citespace software that operates a graph visualization function was used to clarify the current situation, hot spots, and evolutionary trends of intelligent education research development; the authors, institutions, and countries engaged in intelligent education research, as well as the basic knowledge structure, main keywords, citation clustering, dual-map overlay of journals and citation emergence of intelligent education research. The results show that the annual number of publications in the field has shown an upward trend since 2010, with strong communication among research institutions and countries, but weak communication among researchers. Among them, the United States is the center of the global collaborative network of intelligent education research. The basic knowledge structure of intelligence education research is mainly composed of Classroom Management, Evaluation Index, 5G Network, and Big Data Analytics. The dual-map overlay analysis of journals shows that the core areas of intelligence education are increasing, and the analysis of keywords and cited literature shows that Intelligence Tutoring System, AI system, Students and Education, Model, and System are high-frequency words with high-intensity burstness. In addition, research on intelligent education is characterized by multi-country, multi-field, and multi-disciplinary integration, and the adoption of Big Data, Distance Education Technology and Artificial Intelligence Technology to provide scientific support for teaching and learning will become the key research content in this field in the future.

show abstract

Section: Foundations Of Intelligent Education Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan kompetensi siswa pada pemograman PLC, pihak pendidik sebaiknya menerapkan model PBL berbantuan kit pelatihan untuk memudahkan pemahaman siswa namun belum berhasil meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. [6] juga telah menyelesaikan penelitian untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan kognitif dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dengan model Project-Based Learning (PBL) yang terintegrasi dengan scientific creativity and critical worksheets (SCCW) dan Conventional student worksheet (CSW) pada siswa SMA. Penggunaan SCCW didapatkan lebih efektif daripada penggunaan CSW dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis serta kognitif siswa.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Improving Students' Critical Thinking Ability with Enhanced-Open Learning Approach Using Adaptive Hypermedia

Sulistyanto

Nurgiyatna

Prayitno

et al. 2022

UJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Critical thinking is important in education because it encourages students to gain an understanding of more complex information. High critical thinking skills will lead students to find and conclude their understanding. The prolonged COVID-19 pandemic has made global changes in the implementation of learning. Until now, the learning process is still directed at the online learning model with the help of various Learning Management System (LMS) platforms. Conditions like this have implications for the decline in students' critical thinking skills in various aspects, such as inference, interpretation, explanation, analysis, evaluation, and self-regulation. This study aims at proposing an alternative learning approach, namely the enhanced-open learning model which is used to empower and improve students' critical thinking skills. This learning model was developed using the Research and Development (R&D) method and implemented with an adaptive hypermedia learning application media designed with the Luther development model. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling on 98 students of informatics education in Surakarta City. The data were analyzed with the prerequisites for normality and homogeneity of the data before the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Mann Whitney U test was carried out to determine the effectiveness of the model. The results of the increase in the gain score obtained from the experiment are in the aspect of interpretation of 93.18%, inference 76.74%, explanation 96.33%, analysis 97, 87%, evaluation 63.01%, and self-regulation 98.13%. Based on the experiments conducted, it is proven that the adaptive open learning approach has a very significant impact on improving students' critical thinking aspects so that it can be concluded that the model is effective in improving students' critical thinking skills.

show abstract

“…Literature has shown that the contents of the recent studies related to scientific creativity are as follows: impact and relationships of different learning and teaching approaches and activities on scientific creativity (Akcanca & Cerrah Ozsevgec, 2017;Astutik, Susantini, Madlazim, Mohamad, & Supeno, 2020;Dewantara, Mahtari, Nur, Yuanita, & Sunarti, 2020;Karademir, 2016;Kozhevnikov, Kozhevnikov, Yu, & Blazhenkova 2013;Panjaitan & Siagian, 2020;Siew & Ambo, 2020;Wicaksono, 2020;Wulansari, Rusnayati, Saepuzaman, Karim, & Feranie, 2019;Zhao, Zhang, Heng, & Qi, 2021;Zhou, 2021), the effects of STEM and STEAM applications on scientific creativity (Calisici & Benzer, 2021;Genek & Doganca Kucuk, 2020;Rasul et al, 2018;Siew & Ambo, 2020), the effects of different thinking models on scientific creativity and the relationships between them (Demir, 2015;Forthmann, Szardenings, & Dumas, 2020;Vries & Lubart, 2017;Wulansari et al, 2019;Zhu, Shang, Jiang, Pei, & Su, 2019), perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs related to scientific creativity and the impact of scientific creativity on academic achievement (Calisici & Benzer, 2021;Demirhan & Sahin, 2021;Lee & Park, 2021;Ndeke, Okere, & Keraro, 2016), evaluation of the relationship between problem-solving skills, questioning skills, and scientific process skills, and scientific creativity (Chen, Hu, & Plicher 2016;Panjaitan & Siagian, 2020;Utemov et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2016;Dewantara et al, 2020), effects of science games and toys, animations, and WEB tutorials on scientific creativity (Atesgoz & Sak, 2021;Demir Kacan, 2015;…”

Section: Scientific Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Creativity Studies in WoS and Scopus Databases

Sarikaya

Çeliker²

2022

IJRES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to examine the trends in recent years by focusing on the bibliometric results of previous studies on scientific creativity. For this purpose, a total of 370 publications on scientific creativity obtained from Web of Science and Scopus databases were examined in terms of different bibliometric variables, and they were presented with visuals and tables. Bibliometric analyses of the publications in both databases were performed separately. Afterwards, a comparison of the top 10 studies that stand out in terms of scientific creativity studies in both databases was made and they were integrated with each other. Tables and images were created using the VOSviewer package program. The results of the study showed that the most frequently used keywords in research in both databases were “scientific creativity” and “creativity”. In both databases, the countries that had the highest number of studies and whose scientific studies were most cited were determined as USA and China. In addition, it was also determined that the top three most cited authors in scientific creativity studies in both databases were D. K. Simonton, W. Hu, and R. J. Sternberg.

show abstract

The influence of scientific creativity and critical worksheets (SCCW) on creative thinking skills and critical scientific as well as students’ cognitive abilities on project-based learning work and energy concepts

Cited by 16 publications

References 9 publications

Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph

Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph

Improving Students' Critical Thinking Ability with Enhanced-Open Learning Approach Using Adaptive Hypermedia

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Creativity Studies in WoS and Scopus Databases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About