The influence of selective enamel etch and self-etch mode of universal adhesives’ application on clinical behavior of composite restorations placed on non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Josić, Uroš; Mazzitelli, Claudia Alejandra; Maravić, Tatjana; Radović, Ivana; Jaćimović, Jelena; Mancuso, Edoardo; Florenzano, Federica; Breschi, Lorenzo; Mazzoni, Annalisa

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2022.01.002

Cited by 33 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…48 A meta-analysis observed no significant differences in terms of marginal discoloration between selective enamel etch and self-etch modes of universal adhesives up to a 2-year follow-up in non-carious cervical lesions. 49 In the present study, although three restorations failed due to caries, marginal deterioration was not detected in any of the restorations.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 42%

“…In accordance with the marginal discoloration findings of the present study, it was shown that when universal adhesives were applied in self‐etch mode, the bond durability of universal adhesives benefited from the application of an extra hydrophobic adhesive layer 48 . A meta‐analysis observed no significant differences in terms of marginal discoloration between selective enamel etch and self‐etch modes of universal adhesives up to a 2‐year follow‐up in non‐carious cervical lesions 49 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Demırcı

Tuncer

Tekçe

et al. 2022

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of a 1-step self-etch dentin adhesive that was applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, doubling the adhesive application time and layer in Class I cavities with a composite resin.Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients aged between 14 and 43 (mean age:19.1) years were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three restorations. In these three restorations, a 1-step self-etch adhesive was applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations (control group), by doubling the adhesive application time, and with double layers. The restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria at baseline, and 1, 2, 3, and 4-year recalls.Results: After 4 years, the success rate was 100% for restorations with the adhesive applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, 96.9% for restorations applied by doubling the adhesive application time, and 93.8% for restorations applied with double adhesive layers. There was no significant difference between the three application methods among all the evaluation periods regarding the evaluation criteria. Conclusions:The 4-year success rates of a 1-step self-etch dentin adhesive that was applied according to the manufacturers' recommendation, by doubling the adhesive application time, and with double layers were excellent.Clinical Significance: It is not recommended to double the adhesive application time nor apply a double layer of a 1-step self-etch adhesive because it does not improve the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 42%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Demırcı

Tuncer

Tekçe

et al. 2022

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, a recent systematic review examining the clinical performance of composite restorations placed in noncarious cervical lesions concluded that the risk of postoperative sensitivity (POS) was higher when UAs are used in ER mode and that SE mode alone is not sufficient for providing adequate retention of composite restorations due to poor enamel demineralization potential (Josic et al 2021). Therefore, the application of UAs in SEE mode was considered the most appropriate approach for minimizing risk of POS and achieving optimal retention in the medium-term period (up to 3 y of follow-up) (Josic, Mazzitelli, Maravic, Radovic, et al 2022).…”

Section: Progress In Universal Adhesive Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As far as the data from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are concerned, the longest follow-up period demonstrating the good performance of composite restorations placed with UAs is 5 y (de Paris Matos et al 2020). However, the clinical performance of UAs largely depends on the adhesive strategy, thus questioning their claimed versatility regarding the application mode in a clinical setting (Josic et al 2021; Josic, Mazzitelli, Maravic, Radovic, et al 2022). Indeed, a recent systematic review examining the clinical performance of composite restorations placed in noncarious cervical lesions concluded that the risk of postoperative sensitivity (POS) was higher when UAs are used in ER mode and that SE mode alone is not sufficient for providing adequate retention of composite restorations due to poor enamel demineralization potential (Josic et al 2021).…”

Section: Progress In Universal Adhesive Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Progress in Dental Adhesive Materials

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There have been significant advances in adhesive dentistry in recent decades, with efforts being made to improve the mechanical and bonding properties of resin-based dental adhesive materials. Various attempts have been made to achieve versatility, introducing functional monomers and silanes into the materials’ composition to enable the chemical reaction with tooth structure and restorative materials and a multimode use. The novel adhesive materials also tend to be simpler in terms of clinical use, requiring reduced number of steps, making them less technique sensitive. However, these materials must also be reliable and have a long-lasting bond with different substrates. In order to fulfill these arduous tasks, different chemical constituents and different techniques are continuously being developed and introduced into dental adhesive materials. This critical review aims to discuss the concepts behind novel monomers, bioactive molecules, and alternative techniques recently implemented in adhesive dentistry. Incorporating monomers that are more resistant to hydrolytic degradation and functional monomers that enhance the micromechanical retention and improve chemical interactions between adhesive resin materials and various substrates improved the performance of adhesive materials. The current trend is to blend bioactive molecules into adhesive materials to enhance the mechanical properties and prevent endogenous enzymatic degradation of the dental substrate, thus ensuring the longevity of resin–dentin bonds. Moreover, alternative etching materials and techniques have been developed to address the drawbacks of phosphoric acid dentin etching. Altogether, we are witnessing a dynamic era in adhesive dentistry, with advancements aiming to bring us closer to simple and reliable bonding. However, simplification and novelty should not be achieved at the expense of material properties.

show abstract

“…Despite the fact that all universal adhesives could be applied in the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode, it is well-known that the self-etch strategy is preferred, mainly when eroded dentin is used as the substrate [39][40][41]. However, for both universal adhesives, higher bond strength and lower silver nitrate uptake values were observed for sound dentin than for eroded dentin.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the Application of Additional Hydrophobic Resin to Universal Adhesives Increase Bonding Longevity of Eroded Dentin?

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper evaluates the effect of an additional hydrophobic resin coat (extra HL) associated with universal adhesives on sound and eroded dentin and evaluated immediately or after 2 years of water storage to improve the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) when compared to the use of universal adhesives only. Sixty-four molars were assigned to eight groups using the following combinations: 1. dentin substrate, including sound and eroded dentin; 2. treatment, including the control and extra HL and storage time (immediately and after two-years of storage). Two universal adhesives (Prime & Bond Active or Scotchbond Universal) were evaluated. Before restoration, half of the teeth were subjected to soft-drink erosion. Composite buildups were bonded; specimens were stored (37 °C/24 h), sectioned into resin–dentin bonded sticks and tested for microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage using SEM (immediately and after two-years of storage). Three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05%) were used. In the immediate testing, the application of extra HL did not increase microtensile bond strength values compared with the control group in either substrate (p > 0.05). However, extra HL significantly decreased nanoleakage values when applied to eroded and sound dentin (p = 0.0001). After two years, the application of extra HL produced significantly higher microtensile bond strength and lower nanoleakage values than the control group for both adhesives (p = 0.0001). In all cases, sound dentin showed higher microtensile bond strength and lower nanoleakage values than eroded dentin (p = 0.000001). An extra HL increased the bond strength and reduced nanoleakage in eroded dentin after two-years of storage.

show abstract

The influence of selective enamel etch and self-etch mode of universal adhesives’ application on clinical behavior of composite restorations placed on non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 33 publications

References 52 publications

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Progress in Dental Adhesive Materials

Does the Application of Additional Hydrophobic Resin to Universal Adhesives Increase Bonding Longevity of Eroded Dentin?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About