1957
DOI: 10.1093/ansci/16.3.623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Stage of Maturity on the Feeding-Value of Oat Hay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
7
0
2

Year Published

1959
1959
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Others mentioned (26) that the consumption of the plant by animals is related to species of greater accumulation of leaf than the stem, even if these two have similar digestibility. By the ratios of leaf and stem presented, the Saia variety is Estos resultados coinciden a los reportados en otros estudios donde determinaron la composición bromatológica del forraje de avenas en estado lechoso-masoso (27,28,29) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Others mentioned (26) that the consumption of the plant by animals is related to species of greater accumulation of leaf than the stem, even if these two have similar digestibility. By the ratios of leaf and stem presented, the Saia variety is Estos resultados coinciden a los reportados en otros estudios donde determinaron la composición bromatológica del forraje de avenas en estado lechoso-masoso (27,28,29) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…De acuerdo con las características proteicas y energéticas, los resultados del forraje de estas variedades se consideran con calidad nutritiva de baja a regular para PC y de regular a buena para Enl (12) . Kraiem et al (27) evaluaron la Cuadro 2. Características nutricionales de las variedades de avena evaluadas en Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other factors known to affect the composition and digestibility of forage are varieties and cultivars (Ørskov et al 1990;Emile Mile et al 2007;Bartl et al 2009), environmental and seasonal effects (Mathison et al 1999;Jacobsen et al 2005), proportion of different morphological fractions of forage (Agbagla-Dohnani et al 2001;Fulkerson et al 2008), stage of maturity at harvested (Meyer et al 1957;Ammar et al 2008). In addition, the effect of additives such as enzymes (Go´mez-Va´zquez et al 2011) on digestibility has also been studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%