2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These made the students exploit their world and improvise, thus providing an effective means of team work and collaboration. This is a graduate attribute and skill that has been shown to benefit students when they eventually move on to professional workplaces (Solimeno, Mebane, Tomai, & Francescato, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These made the students exploit their world and improvise, thus providing an effective means of team work and collaboration. This is a graduate attribute and skill that has been shown to benefit students when they eventually move on to professional workplaces (Solimeno, Mebane, Tomai, & Francescato, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith (2011) found (n=507) that a series of factors including preparedness for online study, the e-tutoring abilities of staff, the level of collaboration with peers, course design and the ICT skills of students were all issues perceived by students to be related to the quality and effectiveness of online learning. Solimeno, Mebane, Tomai and Francescato (2008) specifically examined the collaborative methodology, arguably more associated with asynchronous online education, and concluded that when comparing with face-to-face collaborative learning, both were equally effective. They concluded that learning strategies (either face-to-face or online) that promote collaborative interactive learning with the peer group could be a key factor in promoting effective learning more generally.…”
Section: Comparing Levels Of Satisfaction Between Online and Face-to-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrariamente às afirmações populares, o treinamento em gestão do tempo nem sempre é eficaz, uma vez que o desempenho depende de outros fatores, como motivação e outras habilidades. Solimeno et al (2008) compararam a eficácia da aprendizagem face a face com a da aprendizagem colaborativa assistida por computador (CSCL) no aumento do conhecimento acadêmico e das competências profissionais. Também exploraram como as características de personalidade e estratégias de aprendizagem dos alunos foram associadas com melhores resultados de aprendizagem em contextos on-line ou face a face.…”
Section: Gestão Do Tempounclassified