The Interaction Effect of Goal Misalignment and Metaknowledge Distribution on Team Decision Making in Operations and Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Many strategic decisions concerning firms’ operations and supply chain management (OSCM) are executed in teams of multiple functional specialists, to reap the proven benefits of internal integration. However, specialists bring with them not only diverse expertise, but also diverse goals and incentive structures. We examine how functional goal misalignment and the distribution of knowledge of who knows what (metaknowledge) affect self‐serving politics and the performance of cross‐functional teams. To test our model, we develop a vignette‐based social team experiment and analyze data from 468 participants grouped in 156 sourcing teams. Our results provide evidence for both catalyst and inverse‐catalyst effects of the distribution of metaknowledge. Specifically, under goal alignment, centralized metaknowledge leads to the catalyzation of cross‐functional expertise, reducing team politics and enhancing team performance. However, under goal misalignment, centralized metaknowledge significantly amplifies team politics and reduces performance via mediation. We contribute to the growing body of research on behavioral OSCM at the team level of analysis by offering theoretical and practical implications for the design of team integration processes from the perspective of organizational politics and group cognition. We also provide management with clear design recommendations regarding how to govern cross‐functional OSCM teams in terms of functional goals and the distribution of metaknowledge.

Project managers' reactions to project disruption: sponsor actions versus environmental uncertainty

“…If economic reward schemes are applied, the payments should reflect valid performance metrics like order picking performance (De Vries et al. , 2016) or supplier efficiency (Franke et al. , 2021), which is infeasible for our design.…”

“…It avoids two fundamental problems: demand effects when participants try to cater to what they believe is the desired outcome of the study to maximize their compensation (Eckerd et al, 2020) and ethical problems of assigning lower payments per design. If economic reward schemes are applied, the payments should reflect valid performance metrics like order picking performance (De Vries et al, 2016) or supplier efficiency (Franke et al, 2021), which is infeasible for our design. Our study focuses on behavioral responses in line with the socialpsychology experimentation paradigm (Eckerd et al, 2020).…”

Assessing the role of industry 4.0 for enhancing swift trust and coordination in humanitarian supply chain

“…Such information is handy and accelerate the HSC performance Gupta et al ( 2019 ) and Paciarotti et al ( 2021 ) Information security It is defined as keeping people's privacy and avoid abusing such private information. Moreover, data encryption avoids data leakage for further misusing Patil et al ( 2021 ) and Gupta et al ( 2019 ) Technical skills It is referred to required skills for working with emerging technologies in order to make the most advantages of the technologies aiming at enhancing HSC performance Franke et al ( 2021 ), Kumar and Singh ( 2021 ) and Adesanya et al ( 2020 ) …”

Rising to the Top: Motivational Forces Influencing Status Conflict in Sourcing Teams

“…The sourcing literature has shown that functional goal misalignment can trigger conflicts regarding the sourcing task and heated emotional debates that may tempt functions to influence the decision via politics, especially when some functions have superior knowledge levels (Franke and Foerstl 2020, Franke et al. 2021). However, formal work demands are not the sole determinant of individual behavior (Kanfer and Chen 2016).…”