2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-014-9305-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interrelationships between brand and channel choice

Abstract: The Interrelationships between Brand and Channel ChoiceWe propose a framework for the joint study of the consumer's decision of where to buy and what to buy. The framework is rooted in utility theory where the utility is for a particular channel/brand combination. The framework contains firm actions, the consumer search process, the choice process, and consumer learning. We develop research questions within each of these areas. We then discuss methodological issues pertaining to the use of experimentation and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
74
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As channels are managed together, the perceived interaction is not with the channel, but with the brand (Rosenblum and Kilcourse, 2013). Therefore, omnichannel world is not only the expansion of channels but also the integration of client-brand-retail interactions (Neslin et al, 2014). Moreover, each customer touch point, such as brand advertising, retailer advertising, in-store communications, word-of-mouth, peer observation (seeing other customers), as well as traditional earned media, can affect the performance of retailers and brands (Baxendale et al, 2015).…”
Section: Opportunities and Threats Of Channel Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As channels are managed together, the perceived interaction is not with the channel, but with the brand (Rosenblum and Kilcourse, 2013). Therefore, omnichannel world is not only the expansion of channels but also the integration of client-brand-retail interactions (Neslin et al, 2014). Moreover, each customer touch point, such as brand advertising, retailer advertising, in-store communications, word-of-mouth, peer observation (seeing other customers), as well as traditional earned media, can affect the performance of retailers and brands (Baxendale et al, 2015).…”
Section: Opportunities and Threats Of Channel Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today we talk no longer only about multichannel strategies. We talk about omnichannel strategies (Brynjolfsson et al, 2013;Neslin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, managers also have an interest in understanding comparative effects of diverse touchpoints in an equivalent manner in order to inform the complete marketing plan. Multiple touchpoints in the consumer search process, including customer interactions with 'sales' channels, can be viewed symmetrically until final choice occurs, as the search process may iterate indefinitely while consumers revise brand/channel utilities (Neslin et al 2014). Such a holistic view of touchpoints is particularly important as media fragmentation sees brand managers increasingly allocate their budgets to what are still often described as "unmeasured media" such as news media coverage and in-store communications (Ailawadi et al 2009, p. 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Showrooming is a form of research shopping, whereby customers will be collecting information from brick-andmortar stores but make purchases through other sales channels, mostly online channel (Neslin et al, 2014). Research shopping is a phenomenon where customers have high tendency to seek information about a product in a sales funnel and make purchases through other sales channels (Verhoef, Neslin, and Vroomen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially multichannel retailing is used service industry and served as a means to distribute goods. Growth and development of technology has made multichannel retailing as a manner for customers to search product information (Van Bruggen et al, 2010;Lariviere et al, 2010;Neslin et al, 2006;Neslin et al, 2014;Vinhas et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%