1970
DOI: 10.1021/ed047p508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The introduction of relevance into a chemistry laboratory course for non-scientists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several innovative ideas on stimulating the interest in chemistry through laboratory have been described (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Their realization, however, needs small student to instructor ratios, longer and more flexible laboratory hours with concomitant increases in work loads of students, faculty, and staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several innovative ideas on stimulating the interest in chemistry through laboratory have been described (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Their realization, however, needs small student to instructor ratios, longer and more flexible laboratory hours with concomitant increases in work loads of students, faculty, and staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laboratory course for nonscience majors has been described briefly in a previous report (6). It consists of one lecture (1 hr) and one lab session (4 hr) per week for 13 weeks.…”
Section: Laboratory Course For Nonscience Majorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research-oriented laboratory programs for freshman students have been instituted at either small, usually liberal arts colleges (3), or at institutions which seem fortunate enough to have expensive equipment for their undergraduate courses (4). There have also been reports of programs designed with the nonscience major specifically in view, in which instructional objectives are somewhat "diluted" (5). All these rather unstructured programs become impractical in the context of larger universities with extremely high class enrollments and varied student backgrounds.…”
Section: Program Design and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we were primarily interested in studying the effectiveness of the learn/challenge-cycle approach, we did not attempt any great degree of innovation in the actual topics selected for the units. They were: (1) general laboratory techniques, (2) chromatography, (3) tions, (4) organic analysis, and (5) spectrophotometry. Since these were topics already covered in our undergraduate laboratory programs, very little expenditure was needed in terms of new equipment or reagents.…”
Section: Program Design and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%