2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (Ir)Responsibility of (Under)Estimating Missing Data

Abstract: It is practically impossible to avoid losing data in the course of an investigation, and it has been proven that the consequences can reach such magnitude that they could even invalidate the results of the study. This paper describes some of the most likely causes of missing data in research in the field of clinical psychology and the consequences they may have on statistical and substantive inferences. When it is necessary to recover the missing information, analyzing the data can become extremely complex. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results, although robust, are preliminary and have been obtained from a cross-sectional study; it is necessary to apply the questionnaire in the clinic to establish cut-off points and see its evolution after vocal rehabilitation or psychological therapy, as other authors have already pointed out [ 12 , 36 ]. A longitudinal study is currently being undertaken to observe the evolution of patients as they progress in their rehabilitation, with special emphasis being placed on planning the sample size to consider the loss of data, a common problem in this type of research [ 37 , 38 ]. All these limitations generate new perspectives for future studies, such as increasing the number of participants, establishing variations of the questionnaire for different laryngectomy modalities, or making comparisons between different countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results, although robust, are preliminary and have been obtained from a cross-sectional study; it is necessary to apply the questionnaire in the clinic to establish cut-off points and see its evolution after vocal rehabilitation or psychological therapy, as other authors have already pointed out [ 12 , 36 ]. A longitudinal study is currently being undertaken to observe the evolution of patients as they progress in their rehabilitation, with special emphasis being placed on planning the sample size to consider the loss of data, a common problem in this type of research [ 37 , 38 ]. All these limitations generate new perspectives for future studies, such as increasing the number of participants, establishing variations of the questionnaire for different laryngectomy modalities, or making comparisons between different countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing at random (MAR): the missing values depend on observed data only. Missing not at random (MNAR): the missing values the missing values depend on missing values themselves [15] . Dexin Shi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two sets of deletions amounted to 9% of our sample. Scholars have recommended that techniques for handling missing data be implemented if more than 10% of the data are missing (Fernández-García, Vallejo-Seco, Livácic-Rosas, & Tuero-Herrero, 2018; Little, Jorgensen, Lang, & Moore, 2014). Of note, no substantial differences were found when missing data were imputed and those results can be requested from the first author.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%