2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The k-dissimilar vehicle routing problem

Abstract: In this paper we de ne a new problem, the aim of which is to nd a set of k dissimilar alternative solutions for a vehicle routing problem (VRP) on a single instance. is problem has several practical applications in the cash-in-transit sector and in the transportation of hazardous materials. A min-max mathematical formulation is developed that minimizes the objective function value of the worst solution. A distance measure is de ned based on the edges shared between pairs of alternative solutions. An iterative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being a critical point with regard to safety, only a few papers address the dissimilarity of the tours, and the VRP version is, as usual, the starting point. Talarico et al defined and studied the k ‐dissimilar VRP ( k d‐VRP), where the similarity between two VRP solutions is defined based on the edges shared between them. The aim is to identify k dissimilar VRP solutions, that is, tours, starting and ending at a depot node, visiting all clients once, and within the vehicles’ capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite being a critical point with regard to safety, only a few papers address the dissimilarity of the tours, and the VRP version is, as usual, the starting point. Talarico et al defined and studied the k ‐dissimilar VRP ( k d‐VRP), where the similarity between two VRP solutions is defined based on the edges shared between them. The aim is to identify k dissimilar VRP solutions, that is, tours, starting and ending at a depot node, visiting all clients once, and within the vehicles’ capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions (2) and (3) imply the continuity of the vehicle tours at each node, considering three different types of nodes: starting, ending or intermediate; (4)- (7) fix the depot as the starting point of the first period = 1 ( (4) and (5)), and ending point of the last period = |L| ( (6) and (7)), each day; (8) and (9) guarantee that each task is serviced once a day and in only one period; (10) imposes a minimum number of services per period, used to define the size of the periods to impose the similarities; (11) and (14) are flow conservation constraints for the first period, while (12), (13), (15), and (16) represent these constraints for the remaining periods; these, together with the linking constraints (17) and (18) force the connectivity of the vehicle tours. Note that (11) are typical generalized flow conservation constraints at each node i, guaranteeing that if an arc (j, i) is served in the first period, then a unit of flow is absorbed at node i.…”
Section: Flow Based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Talarico et al. () considered the cash transportation problem as a practical application of the k‐dissimilar VRP. In order to increase unpredictability, an index of similarity, on the basis of the number of identical edges common between alternative solutions, was proposed.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this approach could be used for generating more flexible routing strategies in order to reduce the risk of robbery. In Talarico et al (2015b), an index of similarity, based on the number of identical edges common between alternative solutions, is presented. Furthermore, both a mathematical formulation, which generalizes the well-known "peripatetic" routing problem, and an iterative metaheuristic are presented to generate a set of k dissimilar and not necessarily edge-disjoint solutions for the VRP.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%