1974
DOI: 10.2307/2094300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Labelling Theory of Mental Illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
0
7

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
142
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…By assigning a label to the value incongruent organization, and thereby linking it to a negatively-evaluated category, a stakeholder group is able to better define, clarify, and enforce its collectively-held values and norms (e.g., Erickson 1962;Kurzban & Leary 2001) and protect its social identity (e.g., Elsbach & Bhattacharya 2001;Sutton & Callahan 1987). As a result, the theoretical basis for both individual and organizational stigma is labeling theory grounded in the sociology of deviance (e.g., Erickson 1962;Gibbs & Erickson 1975;Kitsuse 1962) and mental illness (e.g., Scheff 1974), which illustrate how labels and interpretations of social actors give meaning to particular acts. As Kitsuse notes, "Forms of behavior per se do not differentiate deviants from nondeviants; it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of the society who identify and interpret behavior as deviant which sociologically transforms persons into deviants.…”
Section: Construct Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assigning a label to the value incongruent organization, and thereby linking it to a negatively-evaluated category, a stakeholder group is able to better define, clarify, and enforce its collectively-held values and norms (e.g., Erickson 1962;Kurzban & Leary 2001) and protect its social identity (e.g., Elsbach & Bhattacharya 2001;Sutton & Callahan 1987). As a result, the theoretical basis for both individual and organizational stigma is labeling theory grounded in the sociology of deviance (e.g., Erickson 1962;Gibbs & Erickson 1975;Kitsuse 1962) and mental illness (e.g., Scheff 1974), which illustrate how labels and interpretations of social actors give meaning to particular acts. As Kitsuse notes, "Forms of behavior per se do not differentiate deviants from nondeviants; it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of the society who identify and interpret behavior as deviant which sociologically transforms persons into deviants.…”
Section: Construct Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If persons or groups cannot be completely removed from access, they are depersonalized, or made invisible, and a powerless status is imposed upon them. In a real way, they have lost their voice (Burton, 1999;Erikson, 1962;Scheff, 1974). Becker (1963) observed this loss at the heart of society's process of victimization and isolation from the resources necessary to create meaning in life.…”
Section: Stigma Unpackedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several carefully constructed studies suggest labeling as a key variable (Jones et al, 1984;Link, 1987;Scheff, 1974;Schumacher et al, in press). People who are known as 'mentally ill' will likely be the victim of mental illness stigma.…”
Section: Hidden Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%