2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01796.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limits of memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This brings us to the normative dimension of collective memory. As Nienass and Poole (2011) point out, collective memory is normative inasmuch as it indicates to us – either individually or collectively – those episodes in the past that we must take into account when deciding what to do in the present (p. 89). Drawing on the Schank and Abelson (1977) model, it can be argued that collective memory conveys a kind of script which, like charters, prescribes guidelines for action.…”
Section: Applying Prolepsis To the Study Of Collective Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings us to the normative dimension of collective memory. As Nienass and Poole (2011) point out, collective memory is normative inasmuch as it indicates to us – either individually or collectively – those episodes in the past that we must take into account when deciding what to do in the present (p. 89). Drawing on the Schank and Abelson (1977) model, it can be argued that collective memory conveys a kind of script which, like charters, prescribes guidelines for action.…”
Section: Applying Prolepsis To the Study Of Collective Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klein’s warning against reification in the field of memory studies can be taken seriously without giving up the notion that humans imbue the material world with meaning in almost any act of communication (Nienass and Poole, 2012: 91–92), but here, we want to address another specific limitation to the memory–materiality relationship assumed by some of the critiques above. A starting point for this issue is the premise that the externalization thesis implied in the accounts by Forty, Nora, and others is not the only productive way to think of the relationship between memory and objects.…”
Section: Materiality and Conceptualizations Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 See Barstad (2010) for a critical examination of the ongoing debate between those who advocate an "absolute dichotomy/discontinuity between memory and history" (p. 7) and those who continue to advocate for a relationship between history and memory. A wider summary by Nienass and Poole (2012) annotates the current views on memory studies within the social sciences.…”
Section: Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%