1968
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-196810000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long-Term Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy in Prevention of Strokes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After 5 years, arteriographic followup was available in 15 patients, with a 13% incidence of recurrent stenosis. Edwards et al 7 reported arteriographic correlation in 30 patients (43 carotid endarterectomies) 5 or more years after carotid endarterectomy; 3 patients had significant restenosis and 6 had stenoses of <25%, yielding a 21% incidence of recurrent disease. Schutz et al 8 reported angiographic evaluation following 59 carotid endarterectomies; 6 of the 59 (10%) were occluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 5 years, arteriographic followup was available in 15 patients, with a 13% incidence of recurrent stenosis. Edwards et al 7 reported arteriographic correlation in 30 patients (43 carotid endarterectomies) 5 or more years after carotid endarterectomy; 3 patients had significant restenosis and 6 had stenoses of <25%, yielding a 21% incidence of recurrent disease. Schutz et al 8 reported angiographic evaluation following 59 carotid endarterectomies; 6 of the 59 (10%) were occluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our incidence of symptomatic recurrence is 4.5%, while others report between 1% and 7%. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The cause of restenosis is not completely understood. Technical errors at the time of the original operation were thought to be the cause of restenosis in six of our 21 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports regarding the incidence of recurrent disease or stenosis of the ICA following endarterectomy have varied widely with values from 1 to 28 % (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). This variation not only reflects the method of diagnosis, but presumably also the expertise of the neurosurgical team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%