2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The loss given default of a low-default portfolio with weak contagion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their disadvantage is the lack of comparisons between the proposed approaches and other (now traditional) methods described in previous research and mentioned above. Therefore, the practical applicability of the conclusions in Wei and Yuan (2016) and Shi et al (2017) is questionable.…”
Section: Development Of Probability Of Default Models For Ldpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their disadvantage is the lack of comparisons between the proposed approaches and other (now traditional) methods described in previous research and mentioned above. Therefore, the practical applicability of the conclusions in Wei and Yuan (2016) and Shi et al (2017) is questionable.…”
Section: Development Of Probability Of Default Models For Ldpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the research dedicated to LDP modelling, of special mention are papers by Wei and Yuan (2016) and Shi et al (2017) that offer approaches to building limit distributions for the share of loss given default (LGD) and cumulative loan losses for the LDP, respectively. Their disadvantage is the lack of comparisons between the proposed approaches and other (now traditional) methods described in previous research and mentioned above.…”
Section: Development Of Probability Of Default Models For Ldpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for Situation (4), assume that the two losses X 1 , X 2 and the two discount factors θ1, θ2 are dependent according to a four‐dimensional FGM copula C(u)=k=14uk1+1i<j4ωij(1ui)(1uj),u[0,1]4, with parameters ωij[1,1],1i<j4. Clearly, (X1,X2,θ1,θ2) follows the four‐dimensional Sarmanov distribution, see Wei and Yuan 25 . Assume further that X 1 and X 2 both follow the Pareto distribution (20) with parameters α1>0 and σ1>0, and θ1 and θ2 both follow the Exponential distribution with intensity λ1>0.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important recent contributions to credit risk modelling are Blanchet-Scalliet et al (2011), Hurd and Zhou (2011), Cont and Minca (2013), Gatarek and Jab lecki (2013), Packham et al (2013), Kijima and Siu (2014), Ballestra and Pacelli (2014), Hao and Li (2015) and Wei and Yuan (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%