1993
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(93)90019-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lyman-Birge-Hopfield bands in aurora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panels where the downward NBZ cell dominates are devoid of NBZ‐associated auroral emission. This is consistent with the appearance of the auroral emissions within the LBHl band, which are mainly driven by electron precipitation, for example, Dashkevich et al (). However, other authors have noted that a substantial percentage of LBHl emission as detected by SUSSI may be driven by proton precipitation (Knight et al, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Panels where the downward NBZ cell dominates are devoid of NBZ‐associated auroral emission. This is consistent with the appearance of the auroral emissions within the LBHl band, which are mainly driven by electron precipitation, for example, Dashkevich et al (). However, other authors have noted that a substantial percentage of LBHl emission as detected by SUSSI may be driven by proton precipitation (Knight et al, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While the populations observed may not match direct (X -+ a) excitation, it is the only process included in the models which have been used for dayglow calculations. Radiative cascade between the singlet states was included in the auroral modeling presented by Cartwright [1978] and by Dashkevich et al [1993], but both fail to match observations of the aurora or dayglow. Radiative cascade between singlet states should be significant based on the transition rate data, which indicate that radiative transitions between the singlet states of N2 are only a factor of -•5 slower than the a-+ X transitions [e.g., Gilmore et al, 1992;MarineIll et al, 1989].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide-field auroral imager (WAI) is designed for studying the dynamics of auroras and potentially for forecasting auroral substorms by imaging the N 2 Lyman–Birge–Hopfield (LBH) auroral bands. The LBH aurora is generated by the collision with the molecular nitrogen of the energetic electron precipitating into the polar upper atmosphere along the Earth’s magnetic field lines 1,2 . The intensity of the auroral LBH emissions depends on the flux and mean energy of the precipitated electrons and the mixed auroral boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%