1985
DOI: 10.1086/163114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The magnetic flux problem and ambipolar diffusion during star formation - One-dimensional collapse. II - Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small degree of ionization in cloud interiors also allows ambipolar diffusion to dump the hydromagnetic waves or magnetic turbulence (thus rendering them irrelevant to star formation) over a characteristic lengthscale comparable to the critical thermal lengthscale (%Jean's length), thereby also leading to the thermalization of linewidths in agreement with observations by and . This point of view is substantiated by multifluid MHD numerical calculations in rectilinear (Paleologou & Mouschovias 1983;Mouschovias et al 1985), cylindrical (Mouschovias & Morton 1991, 1992a, 1992b, and axisymmetric geometries (Fiedler & Mouschovias 1992Ciolek & Mouschovias 1993Morton et al 1994;Desch & Mouschovias 2001; C. Eng & T. Mouschovias 2005, in preparation). For a cloud as a whole and for a core during its ambipolardiffusion-controlled, quasistatic (or subcritical) phase of contraction, magnetic braking is very effective and keeps the core and the cloud essentially corotating with the background (Mouschovias 1977(Mouschovias , 1979aMouschovias & Paleologou 1979Mouschovias & Morton 1985a, 1985bBasu & Mouschovias 1994, 1995a, 1995b.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The small degree of ionization in cloud interiors also allows ambipolar diffusion to dump the hydromagnetic waves or magnetic turbulence (thus rendering them irrelevant to star formation) over a characteristic lengthscale comparable to the critical thermal lengthscale (%Jean's length), thereby also leading to the thermalization of linewidths in agreement with observations by and . This point of view is substantiated by multifluid MHD numerical calculations in rectilinear (Paleologou & Mouschovias 1983;Mouschovias et al 1985), cylindrical (Mouschovias & Morton 1991, 1992a, 1992b, and axisymmetric geometries (Fiedler & Mouschovias 1992Ciolek & Mouschovias 1993Morton et al 1994;Desch & Mouschovias 2001; C. Eng & T. Mouschovias 2005, in preparation). For a cloud as a whole and for a core during its ambipolardiffusion-controlled, quasistatic (or subcritical) phase of contraction, magnetic braking is very effective and keeps the core and the cloud essentially corotating with the background (Mouschovias 1977(Mouschovias , 1979aMouschovias & Paleologou 1979Mouschovias & Morton 1985a, 1985bBasu & Mouschovias 1994, 1995a, 1995b.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In all of the processes discussed so far, AD has not played a role. This is of course due to the well‐known fact that AD is not dynamically relevant until densities as high as n AD ∼ 10 5 cm −3 are reached (Mouschovias, Paleologou & Fiedler 1985). Such densities are only reached in the dense cores of MCs and therefore AD is not expected to cause any important effects on the global evolution of MCs.…”
Section: Evolution Of the M2fr In Molecular Clouds: From Sub‐ To Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a blob of matter would therefore have to get rid of most of its flux before becoming a star. Ambipolar diffusion has long been suggested as a means by which the magnetic flux problem could be resolved (e.g., Mestel & Spitzer 1956;Mouschovias 1978;Paleologou & Mouschovias 1983;Nakano 1984;Mouschovias, Paleologou, & Fiedler 1985). In general, these earlier studies focused primarily on the role of ambipolar diffusion and the magnetic flux problem for the pre-PMF phase of protostellar evolution.…”
Section: Implications To the Magnetic Flux Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%