2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00330.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Manufacturing Wage Inequality in Latin America and East Asia: Openness, Technology Transfer, and Labor Supply

Abstract: This paper examines wage inequality in the manufacturing sector for a panel of Latin American and East Asian economies during the last three decades. A labor supply and demand model is presented where three main determinants of wage inequality are investigated: trade openness, technology transfer, and labor supply. Findings indicate that wage inequality in the two regions has responded differently to the various determinants enumerated above. Some lessons from the comparative experience of the two regions are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The negative and significant coefficient of imported intermediate inputs as a share of total inputs supports theoretical predictions about factor remuneration and some existing cross-country evidence, including on Asia (Wood 1997, Avalos andSavvides 2006). A potential explanation has to do with the heavy involvement of Asian economies in global and regional production chains.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 The negative and significant coefficient of imported intermediate inputs as a share of total inputs supports theoretical predictions about factor remuneration and some existing cross-country evidence, including on Asia (Wood 1997, Avalos andSavvides 2006). A potential explanation has to do with the heavy involvement of Asian economies in global and regional production chains.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Compared to studies that only examine the country level (e.g. Avalos andSavvides 2006, Bigsten andMunshi 2014), our analysis accounts for heterogeneity across sectors. Furthermore, in contrast to previous industry-level studies, which are confined to a subset of high-technology industries within the manufacturing sector (Martorano and Sanfilippo 2015), we extend the analysis to all the main industries of the economy, fully accounting for both within-sector and between-sectors structural transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Falzoni, Venturini and Villosio (2005) suggest trade is the most important cause of wage inequality, whereas Esquivel and Rodríguez-López (2003) and Onaran and Stockhammer (2007) suggest is FDI. Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman (1998) and Avalos and Savvides (2003) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, tariff reduction should lead to a proportional decline in industry wages and make the workers who were previously protected worse off. However, trade openness is also expected to increase the demand for, and productivity of, the abundant unskilled labour and may therefore narrow the wage gap (Avalos and Savvides, 2006). Jonsson and Subrmanian (2001) and Sjoholm (1997) explain that exporting enables firms to learn new technology, so they tend to produce a higher quality product.…”
Section: Explaining Wage Premiums (Second Stage)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical literature shows that wage premiums can be affected by, (a) the number of skilled workers (b) changes in labour productivity, and (c) increased trade openness (Helpman et al, 2012;Ing, 2009;Avalos and Savvides, 2006). Due to the possibility of skilled workers, labour productivity, and tariffs and exports being endogenous, tests for (Angrist and Krueger, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%