2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mapping of form and interpretation: the case of optional wh-movement in French

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
31
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The EPP property attracts the wh-phrase to the edge of C. Note that Chomsky (2005b) ascribes this function to the edge-feature EF that is automatically available for a lexical item (LI). 10 Note that for in situ wh an abstract Q-feature operator in CP was argued for by Cheng and Rooryck (2000), Mathieu (2004), and Hamann (2006). 11 A possible variant of the in situ analysis may involve a shorter movement to the edge of vP, with a subsequent Agree relation established with a feature in the C system.…”
Section: Direct Wh-questions From Embedded Clausesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The EPP property attracts the wh-phrase to the edge of C. Note that Chomsky (2005b) ascribes this function to the edge-feature EF that is automatically available for a lexical item (LI). 10 Note that for in situ wh an abstract Q-feature operator in CP was argued for by Cheng and Rooryck (2000), Mathieu (2004), and Hamann (2006). 11 A possible variant of the in situ analysis may involve a shorter movement to the edge of vP, with a subsequent Agree relation established with a feature in the C system.…”
Section: Direct Wh-questions From Embedded Clausesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view receives support from Mathieu's (2004) analysis of the informational structure of combien subextraction in French. He argues that the stranded nominal in combien subextraction contexts is a new topic, unlike a pied-piped nominal, which is part of focus.…”
Section: Wh-subextraction In Catalanmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Narrow scope and adjacency with a verbal head are properties reminiscent of those displayed by incorporated elements (see Bittner 1988, de Hoop 1992, van Geenhoven 1998, Farkas & de Swart 2003, and Mathieu 2004, 2006 for French), which are also characterized by the lack of number inflection or variation 5…”
Section: Activity Nominalsmentioning
confidence: 99%