1994
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Marginal Cost of Species Preservation: The Northern Spotted Owl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of survival for a species depends upon the quantity, quality, and spatial pattern of habitat. Several recent studies have integrated population biology modeling and economic analysis to assess the tradeoff between species survival and economic returns for a single species (Haight 1995;Montgomery, Brown, and Adams 1994;Marshall, Haight, and Homans 1998). Montgomery et al (1999) illustrate the cost of conserving species under alternative land use plans for Monroe Country, Pennsylvania.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of survival for a species depends upon the quantity, quality, and spatial pattern of habitat. Several recent studies have integrated population biology modeling and economic analysis to assess the tradeoff between species survival and economic returns for a single species (Haight 1995;Montgomery, Brown, and Adams 1994;Marshall, Haight, and Homans 1998). Montgomery et al (1999) illustrate the cost of conserving species under alternative land use plans for Monroe Country, Pennsylvania.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montgomery et al [20] analyze land use allocation at a county level and trace out a cost curve for conserving species. Several papers analyze the tradeoff between the value of timber production and species conservation in forested landscapes (e.g., [3,6,10,15,24]) or the opportunity cost of protecting an endangered species (e.g, [12,18,19]). …”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, management decisions are often based on qualitative anecdotal information or management practices that have been implemented in the past (Pullin & Knight, 2005). There are several examples of studies where management actions have been tested and evaluated for their effectiveness using evidence (for example Smith et al, 2010;St Clair et al, 2011), but few have incorporated management costs (Naidoo et al, 2006) or developed return on investment relationships (but see Montgomery, Brown & Adams, 1994;Wilson et al, 2007;Busch & Cullen, 2009;Duca et al, 2009). When the effectiveness of a management action is estimated or assumed, there is no guarantee that investment in that action will achieve the conservation objective cost-effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%