2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201013993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription

Abstract: Mass loss of red supergiants (RSG) is important for the evolution of massive stars, but is not fully explained. Several empirical prescriptions have been proposed, trying to express the mass-loss rate (Ṁ) as a function of fundamental stellar parameters (mass, luminosity, effective temperature). Our goal is to test whether the de Jager et al. (1988, A&AS, 72, 259) prescription, which is used in some stellar evolution models, is still valid in view of more recent mass-loss determinations. By considering 40 Gala… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
237
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
23
237
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a luminous yellow supergiant in one of these clusters is also consistent with the idea that this star evolved away from the RSG stage (Davies et al 2008). Mauron & Josselin (2011), on the other hand, still recommend using the de Jager et al (1988) rate for Galactic RSGs, indicating that this prescription agrees to within a factor of 4 with most mass-loss rate estimates based on the infrared 60 μm excess. This result is however compatible with the existence of short phases during which the mass-loss rates are much stronger.…”
Section: Discussion Of Various Possible Origins For the Low-luminositsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The presence of a luminous yellow supergiant in one of these clusters is also consistent with the idea that this star evolved away from the RSG stage (Davies et al 2008). Mauron & Josselin (2011), on the other hand, still recommend using the de Jager et al (1988) rate for Galactic RSGs, indicating that this prescription agrees to within a factor of 4 with most mass-loss rate estimates based on the infrared 60 μm excess. This result is however compatible with the existence of short phases during which the mass-loss rates are much stronger.…”
Section: Discussion Of Various Possible Origins For the Low-luminositsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is in agreement with typical mass-loss rates of RSGs of this luminosity, significantly smaller than in super-AGB stars (Poelarends et al 2008;Mauron & Josselin 2011) and greater than in BSGs (Martins et al 2015). However, asymmetry and inhomogeneity (e.g., clumpiness) in the CSM can greatly affect our estimated optical depth.…”
Section: The Progenitor Of Sn 2010dasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…, van Loon et al 2005;Mauron & Josselin 2011) and exceeds the limit for mass loss due to the commonly assumed line-driven winds even in the case of a small filling factor f = 0.1 of the H-rich shell (e.g., Smith 2014, their Figure3). This scenario is explored in M15.…”
Section: The Origin Of the H-rich Shell In Sn 2014cmentioning
confidence: 88%