The Measurement of the Spiritual Tourism in Regions of South Kazakhstan

Abstract

This article is designed to provide a quantitative measuring of the spiritual tourism management in society in South Kazakhstan region, Kyzylorda and Zhambyl regions. The aim of this study is to develop a spiritual model of the Department of tourism. Especially, the aim of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of three-factor model in the spiritual management of tourism. The research mainly involves a survey plan. It includes a pilot test using with undergraduate students majoring in tourism management of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi International kazakh-turkish university for pre-testing questionnaire items. In addition, it researches the public potency, attraction of potential opportunities, and community cooperation attributes necessitates uncovering variables of interest and this involves a large-scale study of field of view. The data come from personal questionnaires of 918 samples. They include the residents in the South Kazakhstan region, Kyzylorda and Zhambyl regions. Respondents asked to rate, on a five-point Likert scale, their agreement or disagreement on the spiritual of tourism management attributes. The program LISREL is used to data analyze since the proposed model is a simultaneous system of equations having hidden structures and multiple indicators. Quantitative data are analyzed using statistical techniques, namely exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling.

Space of Conflict in the Reproduction of Hindu Sacred Places into Spiritual Destination

“…This phenomenon emerged as a way of criticism of industrial societies, resulting in the development of tourist visits aimed at enjoying nature (Brown, 1994) resulting in studies on spiritual tourism related to nature as a medium of spiritualism (Wang et al, 2023) and medium of well-being (Buzinde, 2020). Nature is also an indicator of spiritual destinations (Kuralbayev et al, 2017). The conservation of nature is a tool for development strategies in the postpandemic (Choe & Mahyuni, 2023).…”

Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Kepemilikan Institusional, Leverage, Dan Pertumbuhan Aset Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan

“…Hal ini menjadikan tantangan tersendiri bagi manajemen perusahaan agar keputusan keuangan yang diambil bisa meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan dan pada akhirnya dapat meningkatkan nilai perusahaan. (Kuralbayev et al, 2016) menganalisis Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2015. Hasil dalam penelitiannya menunjukkan hasil bahwa kepemilikan institusional (INST), keputusan investasi tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan keputusan pendanaan (DER) berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan.…”

Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Struktur Modal, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Subsektor Transportasi

“…Berbeda pada temuan penelitan (Arastika & Khairunnisa, 2020) yang menyatakan bahwa struktur modal tidak mempunyai pengaruh dengan nilai perusahaan namun profitabilitas memberi pengaruh dengan nilai perusahaan. Pengamatan ini sejalan dengan pengamatan yang dilaksanakan (Kuralbayev et al, 2016) dimana menyebut bila struktur modal berpengaruh negatif signifikan dengan nilai perusahaan.…”