A Companion to Medical Anthropology 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444395303.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Medical Anthropology of Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anthropologies of water (e.g., Ballestero 2019;Hastrup and Hastrup 2015) also emerge from research in the many perspectives outlined above, and are crucial to future collaborative and creative work. Medical anthropologies of water initially focused closely on water-borne or water-related diseases (see Whiteford and Vindrola Padros 2011), but other, more subtle health issues have emerged at the intersection with environmental research. Of particular interest, beyond the potential to ingest toxins, the psychological and social strain of living with scarce water resources has been documented in a variety of locations (Ennis-McMillan 2001;Wutich and Ragsdale 2008).…”
Section: Factors and Actors Beyond The Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropologies of water (e.g., Ballestero 2019;Hastrup and Hastrup 2015) also emerge from research in the many perspectives outlined above, and are crucial to future collaborative and creative work. Medical anthropologies of water initially focused closely on water-borne or water-related diseases (see Whiteford and Vindrola Padros 2011), but other, more subtle health issues have emerged at the intersection with environmental research. Of particular interest, beyond the potential to ingest toxins, the psychological and social strain of living with scarce water resources has been documented in a variety of locations (Ennis-McMillan 2001;Wutich and Ragsdale 2008).…”
Section: Factors and Actors Beyond The Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whiteford and Whiteford () argued that a focus on water's globalizing economic dimensions is crucial to understanding who is at risk of contracting diseases that are waterborne (e.g., cholera), water washed (e.g., shigellosis), water based (e.g., schistosomiasis), and water related (e.g., malaria). In Peru, Ecuador, and Venezuela, for instance, cholera outbreaks in the 1990s were intensified by the dynamics of socioeconomic marginality (Briggs ; Whiteford and Padros ). Medical anthropologists warn that large‐scale global changes—including neoliberalization, urbanization, globalization, and climate change—have created the conditions for a resurgence of water‐related diseases like dengue and malaria (Baer and Singer ).…”
Section: The Economic Anthropology Of Water and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first example is the chapter on “Syndemics in Global Health” by Singer et al (2011). The syndemic orientation “recognizes the fundamental biosocial nature of health and that constellations of diseases and other health conditions interact synergistically, in consequential ways” and “emphasizes the ways that social conditions shape disease processes, often through broader environmental mediation.” Although not framing their chapter in the volume within syndemic approach per se, one could make the case that the contribution on “The Medical Anthropology of Water” by Linda M. Whiteford and Cecelia Vindrola Padros (2011) adheres to both the syndemic and global health approaches. They assert that “[e]nvironmental policy, and particularly water policy, brings new challenges for anthropological engagement” (Whiteford and Padros 2011:209).…”
Section: Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%