The Mouse Formin, FRLα, Slows Actin Filament Barbed End Elongation, Competes with Capping Protein, Accelerates Polymerization from Monomers, and Severs Filaments

Harris, Elizabeth S.; Li, Fang; Higgs, Henry N.

doi:10.1074/jbc.m312718200

Cited by 189 publications

(258 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

243

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In vitro, the FH2 domain nucleates actin filaments from monomers Sagot et al, 2002b;Kovar et al, 2003;Li and Higgs, 2003;Harris et al, 2004;Kobielak et al, 2004), but distinct from other nucleators, it remains associated with the growing barbed end to promote elongation, even in the presence of barbed-end capping proteins Kovar et al, 2003;Li and Higgs, 2003;Pring et al, 2003;Harris et al, 2004;Kobielak et al, 2004;Moseley et al, 2004). The FH1 region is a proline-rich stretch that recruits profilin, an actin-monomer binding protein essential for formin function in vivo , to participate in FH2-mediated nucleation in vitro (Sagot et al, 2002b;Kovar et al, 2003;Pring et al, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stable and Dynamic Axes of Polarity Use Distinct Formin Isoforms in Budding Yeast

Pruyne

Gao

et al. 2004

MBoC

151

208

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bud growth in yeast is guided by myosin-driven delivery of secretory vesicles from the mother cell to the bud. We find transport occurs along two sets of actin cables assembled by two formin isoforms. The Bnr1p formin assembles cables that radiate from the bud neck into the mother, providing a stable mother-bud axis. These cables also depend on septins at the neck and are required for efficient transport from the mother to the bud. The Bni1p formin assembles cables that line the bud cortex and target vesicles to varying locations in the bud. Loss of these cables results in morphological defects as vesicles accumulate at the neck. Assembly of these cables depends on continued polarized secretion, suggesting vesicular transport provides a positive feedback signal for Bni1p activation, possibly by rho-proteins. By coupling different formin isoforms to unique cortical landmarks, yeast uses common cytoskeletal elements to maintain stable and dynamic axes in the same cell. INTRODUCTIONProper cell polarization requires a balance between dynamism and stability. Persistent systems, such as the apical and basolateral domains of epithelial cells, show a higher stability than flexible systems, such as cells undergoing chemotaxis. However, both types can use similar cytoskeletal components, so an important task in understanding the control of polarity is to identify features that influence persistence, and how those features integrate with the core cytoskeletal machinery providing the physical expression of polarity.The process of bud growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a model for examining the control of polarity (for reviews, see Bretscher, 2003;Chang and Peter, 2003). Secretory organelles, such as the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum, are distributed throughout the bud and mother cell, whereas post-Golgi secretory vesicles concentrate at discrete growth sites at the cell cortex. These vesicles are guided to these sites along what are essentially two axes of polarity: a stable axis directing traffic from the mother into the bud, and a dynamic axis that fine-tunes delivery from the bud neck to specific regions in the bud, sending vesicles first to the small bud tip, then to the entire bud surface, and finally back toward the neck during mother/daughter separation. On delivery to these locations, post-Golgi vesicles fuse with the cell surface to promote localized cell expansion.Two class-V myosins, with heavy chains encoded by MYO2 (Johnston et al., 1991) and MYO4 (Haarer et al., 1994), propel cellular components, including vesicles, organelles, mRNAs, and microtubules, from the mother into the bud during growth and organelle segregation. The myosins move along cables of actin filaments that radiate throughout the cell in arrays oriented toward growth sites (Adams and Pringle, 1984;Kilmartin and Adams, 1984).Assembly of these cables depends on two formin homologues, Bni1p and Bnr1p (Evangelista et al., 2002;Sagot et al., 2002a), members of a family of cytoskeletal regulatory proteins defined by conserved fo...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stable and Dynamic Axes of Polarity Use Distinct Formin Isoforms in Budding Yeast

Pruyne

Gao

et al. 2004

MBoC

151

208

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It was shown that the FH1 domain of formins can mediate interactions with profilin, an abundant actin-binding protein, thereby sequestering actin monomers Sagot et al, 2002b;Moseley et al, 2004). The FH2 domain provides the activity for nucleation of actin cables Sagot et al, 2002a;Kovar et al, 2003;Harris et al, 2004;Moseley et al, 2004). This domain is the most conserved and best characterized domain within formins and was used as a basis for the phylogenetic classification of over a hundred formins (Higgs and Peterson, 2005).…”

Section: The a Gossypii Formin Family Membersmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Function to Shape: A Novel Role of a Formin in Morphogenesis of the FungusAshbya gossypii

Schmitz

Kaufmann

Köhli

et al. 2006

MBoC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Morphogenesis of filamentous ascomycetes includes continuously elongating hyphae, frequently emerging lateral branches, and, under certain circumstances, symmetrically dividing hyphal tips. We identified the formin AgBni1p of the model fungus Ashbya gossypii as an essential factor in these processes. AgBni1p is an essential protein apparently lacking functional overlaps with the two additional A. gossypii formins that are nonessential. Agbni1 null mutants fail to develop hyphae and instead expand to potato-shaped giant cells, which lack actin cables and thus tip-directed transport of secretory vesicles. Consistent with the essential role in hyphal development, AgBni1p locates to tips, but not to septa. The presence of a diaphanous autoregulatory domain (DAD) indicates that the activation of AgBni1p depends on Rho-type GTPases. Deletion of this domain, which should render AgBni1p constitutively active, completely changes the branching pattern of young hyphae. New axes of polarity are no longer established subapically (lateral branching) but by symmetric divisions of hyphal tips (tip splitting). In wild-type hyphae, tip splitting is induced much later and only at much higher elongation speed. When GTP-locked Rho-type GTPases were tested, only the young hyphae with mutated AgCdc42p split at their tips, similar to the DAD deletion mutant. Two-hybrid experiments confirmed that AgBni1p interacts with GTP-bound AgCdc42p. These data suggest a pathway for transforming one axis into two new axes of polar growth, in which an increased activation of AgBni1p by a pulse of activated AgCdc42p stimulates additional actin cable formation and tip-directed vesicle transport, thus enlarging and ultimately splitting the polarity site.

show abstract

“…The budding yeast formin Bni1p also binds the actin monomer-binding protein Bud6p, which, similar to profilin, stimulates the activity of the FH2 domain (Moseley and Goode, 2005). In addition to their activity in actin filament nucleation and elongation, some formins have been suggested to also function in actin bundling and severing, further contributing to the remodeling of actin structures (Harris et al, 2004Moseley and Goode, 2005;Harris et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regulation of the Formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p

Martin

Rincón

Basu

et al. 2007

MBoC

138

167

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Formins are conserved actin nucleators responsible for the assembly of diverse actin structures. Many formins are controlled through an autoinhibitory mechanism involving the interaction of a C-terminal DAD sequence with an N-terminal DID sequence. Here, we show that the fission yeast formin for3p, which mediates actin cable assembly and polarized cell growth, is regulated by a similar autoinhibitory mechanism in vivo. Multiple sites govern for3p localization to cell tips. The localization and activity of for3p are inhibited by an intramolecular interaction of divergent DAD and DID-like sequences. A for3p DAD mutant expressed at endogenous levels produces more robust actin cables, which appear to have normal organization and dynamics. We identify cdc42p as the primary Rho GTPase involved in actin cable assembly and for3p regulation. Both cdc42p, which binds at the N terminus of for3p, and bud6p, which binds near the C-terminal DAD-like sequence, are needed for for3p localization and full activity, but a mutation in the for3p DAD restores for3p localization and other phenotypes of cdc42 and bud6 mutants. In particular, the for3p DAD mutation suppresses the bipolar growth (NETO) defect of bud6⌬ cells. These findings suggest that cdc42p and bud6p activate for3p by relieving autoinhibition. INTRODUCTIONFormins are key regulators of the actin cytoskeleton and form a large family conserved in all eukaryotes Faix and Grosse, 2006). These proteins are necessary for the formation of numerous actin structures, including stress fibers, filopodia, cytokinetic actin rings, junctional actin structures, or actin cables. The proper regulation of formins is likely to be critical for cellular processes such as cell migration, cytokinesis, cell adhesion, and cell polarity.A well characterized biochemical activity of formins is to nucleate and elongate linear actin filaments Sagot et al., 2002b;Kovar et al., 2003;Li and Higgs, 2003;Moseley et al., 2004). This activity occurs through the formin-homology (FH) 2 domain, which dimerizes to form a doughnut-shaped structure containing multiple actin-binding sites in its core Otomo et al., 2005b). This dimer is thought to stabilize otherwise unstable intermediates in the assembly of new actin filaments, and it binds processively to the fast-elongating barbed end of existing actin filaments (Pring et al., 2003;Kovar and Pollard, 2004).The adjacent FH1 domain binds profilin-actin and helps accelerate the elongation of actin filaments (Chang et al., 1997;Evangelista et al., 1997;Watanabe et al., 1997;Romero et al., 2004;Kovar et al., 2006). The budding yeast formin Bni1p also binds the actin monomer-binding protein Bud6p, which, similar to profilin, stimulates the activity of the FH2 domain (Moseley and Goode, 2005). In addition to their activity in actin filament nucleation and elongation, some formins have been suggested to also function in actin bundling and severing, further contributing to the remodeling of actin structures (Harris et al., 2004Moseley and Goode, 2005;Harris et al., 2006...

show abstract

The Mouse Formin, FRLα, Slows Actin Filament Barbed End Elongation, Competes with Capping Protein, Accelerates Polymerization from Monomers, and Severs Filaments

Cited by 189 publications

References 29 publications

Stable and Dynamic Axes of Polarity Use Distinct Formin Isoforms in Budding Yeast

Stable and Dynamic Axes of Polarity Use Distinct Formin Isoforms in Budding Yeast

From Function to Shape: A Novel Role of a Formin in Morphogenesis of the FungusAshbya gossypii

Regulation of the Formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About