2003
DOI: 10.1080/0961452032000166456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-image development NGO: An agent of the new imperialism?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, NGOs are not universally acclaimed. They have been accused of being 'Janus-like' organisations exhibiting 'mushroom growth' (Turner & Hulme, 1997); continuing the missionary tradition and being handmaidens of capitalist change (Temple, 1997); showing scanty evidence of superior long-term performance (1993;Vivian & Maseko, 1994); being resource brokers rather than change agents (Pearce, 2006); providing palliatives to poverty rather than precipitating significant structural change (Tembo, 2003;Wright, 2012); serving so many of the divergent vested interests that fundamental development problems are denied (Rahmani, 2012;Wright, 2012); and drifting from their original mission and even into financial corruption (Gibelman & Gelman, 2004;Townsend & Townsend, 2004). Independent information on NGOs' practices and whether beliefs underpinning their rapid growth are justified is lacking (Jordan & Van Tuijl, 2000).…”
Section: The Rise Of Non-governmental Organisations: Accountability Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, NGOs are not universally acclaimed. They have been accused of being 'Janus-like' organisations exhibiting 'mushroom growth' (Turner & Hulme, 1997); continuing the missionary tradition and being handmaidens of capitalist change (Temple, 1997); showing scanty evidence of superior long-term performance (1993;Vivian & Maseko, 1994); being resource brokers rather than change agents (Pearce, 2006); providing palliatives to poverty rather than precipitating significant structural change (Tembo, 2003;Wright, 2012); serving so many of the divergent vested interests that fundamental development problems are denied (Rahmani, 2012;Wright, 2012); and drifting from their original mission and even into financial corruption (Gibelman & Gelman, 2004;Townsend & Townsend, 2004). Independent information on NGOs' practices and whether beliefs underpinning their rapid growth are justified is lacking (Jordan & Van Tuijl, 2000).…”
Section: The Rise Of Non-governmental Organisations: Accountability Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of civil society, even if tokenistic, is critical to the government's policy-making processes and its own access to resources (Pearce 2000;Hearn 2001;Nyamugasira and Rowden, 2002;Power 2003;Abrahamsen 2000;Craig and Porter 2005;Tembo 2003). According to Fowler, partnerships are premised on the assumption that the 'state, market and third sector can apparently be persuaded or induced to perform in consort' (Fowler 2000: 5) in other words, inclusive neo-liberalism (Craig and Porter 2005) -and on building social capital (Power 2003).…”
Section: Opportunity For Dialogue With Civil Societymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One way of doing this is to label the gender-focused NGOs as 'foreign' and 'elitist', thus undermining their identity and status and seeking to de-link them from the broader civil society. It may accuse NGOs of failing as 'representatives of the people', claiming that they are designed for the self-aggrandisement of narrow-minded elites (Pearce 2000) or even agents of imperialism (Tembo 2003). For example, in a letter to the Minister of Constitutional Affaris, the President said that he had .…”
Section: De-legitimising Gender-focused Ngo Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In an African context, Kasfir (1998), Tembo (2003, and Mohan and Stokke (2007) have all challenged these rather benign and liberal interpretations of global civil society, and drawn attention to how donor civil society programmes and international NGO support can often be harmful to indigenous democratic formations. Harrison (2004) has also noted how the proliferation of NGO networks in these countries has been implicitly tied into post-conditionality forms of donor control which focus on 'governance' reform, i.e.…”
Section: Global Civil Society and Post-colonial Societiesmentioning
confidence: 97%