2012
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi‐iterative closest point tracker: An online algorithm for tracking multiple interacting targets

Abstract: We describe and evaluate a greedy detection‐based algorithm for tracking a variable number of dynamic targets online. The algorithm leverages the well‐known iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm for aligning target models with target detections. The approach differs from trackers that seek globally optimal solutions because it treats the problem as a set of individual tracking problems. The method works for multiple targets by sequentially matching models to detections, and then removing detections from furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make use of the full 3D shape of the tracked object, some trackers have attempted to align the object's point clouds using ICP and its variants [5,14]. Such trackers use a local hill-climbing approach to iteratively improve an alignment of two point clouds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make use of the full 3D shape of the tracked object, some trackers have attempted to align the object's point clouds using ICP and its variants [5,14]. Such trackers use a local hill-climbing approach to iteratively improve an alignment of two point clouds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we compare to the basic point-to-point ICP algorithm, using the implementation from PCL [21]. This basic method is used for tracking by Feldman et al [5]. We initialize ICP by aligning the centroids of the tracked object.…”
Section: B Evaluation: Relative Reference Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D Tracking and Reconstruction In contrast to methods that track targets in 3D (e.g., [19,11,32]), we have access only to videos and do not use other sensor modalities such as range data. Compared with methods that perform joint 3D reconstruction and tracking (e.g., [16,18]), we are interested mainly in estimating the 3D pose and shape extent of the target in terms of its part layout.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the state of the target at time t, i.e., 3D aspect part locations and viewpoint, is predicted as the MAP of the posterior at time t, which is given by the sample with the largest posterior probability in Eq. (11). By sampling new viewpoints, we are able to predict the topological appearance change of the target, so as to apply and update the part templates accordingly.…”
Section: Particle Filtering Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the problem above can be effectively solved if we use several laser range finders based on collaborative perception. Adam et al [12] proposed and evaluated a detection-based algorithm for tracking a variable number of dynamic targets online using multi-laser range finders. In [13], a system to detect and track of moving objects at an intersection using a network of horizontal laser range finders is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%