2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for evidence-based conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
902
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,534 publications
(955 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
902
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a survey of the application of science in landscape and wildlife management, only~11% of management decisions drew on scientific reviews, and 2.4% on primary literature (Sutherland et al 2004). The reasons given were that applying science is too time-consuming (65%) and too hard to understand (25%).…”
Section: Contributions Of Landscape and Dispersal Genetics To Economimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of the application of science in landscape and wildlife management, only~11% of management decisions drew on scientific reviews, and 2.4% on primary literature (Sutherland et al 2004). The reasons given were that applying science is too time-consuming (65%) and too hard to understand (25%).…”
Section: Contributions Of Landscape and Dispersal Genetics To Economimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent development of systematic reviews and synopses (e.g. Dicks et al 2013, Sutherland et al 2004, Williams et al 2013 help bridge the gap between academics and practitioners by providing critically reviewed, reliable and easily accessible information for evidence-based conservation practice, management and policy (Habel et al 2013, Knight et al 2008. In addition to ensuring the availability of scientific knowledge to practitioners by facilitating information flow from the scientific community to the practitioners, there is also a need for a reverse information flow from the practitioners towards the academics to increase the relevance of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An 'evidence-based approach' and 'participatory action research' (which is rather similar) have been proposed as useful for its development, the former inspired by its success in medicine (A.C. Hamilton & Hamilton, 2006;Song & Vernooy, 2010;Sutherland, Pullin, Dolman & Knight, 2004). There have already been some attempts at an evidence-based approach, for example a programme of WWF to identify best practice in integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) (McShane, 1999) and another of Plantlife International to identify how communities can best conserve their medicinal plants (A.C. Hamilton, 2008;Pei et al, 2010).…”
Section: Developing Plant Conservation As a Servicementioning
confidence: 99%