2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nova Shell and Evolution of the Recurrent Nova T Pyxidis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
155
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
13
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of the nova is relatively slow, thereby providing time and scope for organizing joint observations with optical interferometry arrays such as CHARA and the VLTI. T Pyx is surrounded by an interesting nebula in expansion that has been investigated by the HST for more than ten years (Schaefer et al 2010, and references therein). The knots are expanding in the plane of the sky with velocities ranging from roughly 500 to 715 km s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the nova is relatively slow, thereby providing time and scope for organizing joint observations with optical interferometry arrays such as CHARA and the VLTI. T Pyx is surrounded by an interesting nebula in expansion that has been investigated by the HST for more than ten years (Schaefer et al 2010, and references therein). The knots are expanding in the plane of the sky with velocities ranging from roughly 500 to 715 km s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I determined an approximate nebular and point source count rate by using the PSF-subtracted total image (merged) of the nebula within about a radius of 5 (the circular extraction area is shown in Fig. 3a; the large circle), since it is about the size of the optical remnant (see Schaefer et al 2010) and the Chandra nebulosity is within 2 of the point source. As in the imaging analysis discussed/outlined above, I used either no smoothing or 1 × 1 pixel and 2 × 2 pixel smoothing for both the PSF and the merged source image with the 0.1 ACIS pixel scale to obtain an approximate nebular count rate.…”
Section: On the Extended Emission Around T Pyxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period change will then give the ejected mass with high accuracy and no need for uncertain quantities (like the distance) or dubious assumptions (like the shell filling factors). For the case of T Pyx (but not for the other RNe), the dynamical friction of the companion star within the nova envelope will also cause a small period change (Livio 1991;Schaefer et al 2010a), and this effect must also be taken into account. The ejected mass is critical for knowing whether the RN white dwarf is gaining or losing mass over the eruption cycle, and hence whether the RN will soon become a Type Ia supernova.…”
Section: Orbital Period Just Before the Eruption P Prementioning
confidence: 99%
“…T Pyx is the only RN that has a nova shell, and this shell has a surprisingly slow expansion velocity plus a structure of thousands of discrete knots (Duerbeck & Seitter 1979;Williams 1982;Shara et al 1989Shara et al , 1997. The homologous expansion of the individual shell fragments proves that they suffer no significant deceleration, and the expansion velocities, viewed over 13 yr by Hubble Space Telescope, prove that the nova shell was ejected in the year 1866 ± 5 at a velocity of 500-715 km s −1 (Schaefer et al 2010a). This velocity is greatly too low to be from an RN event, and with the measured mass in the shell (∼10 −4.5 M ) being much greater than is possible for an RN event, we know that the 1866 event must have been a normal classical nova eruption with a very long time of prior quiescence (Schaefer et al 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation