2007
DOI: 10.1021/nl071158l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optical Visibility of Graphene:  Interference Colors of Ultrathin Graphite on SiO2

Abstract: Monatomic layers of graphite are emerging as building blocks for novel optoelectronic devices. Experimental studies on a single graphite layer (graphene) are today possible since very thin graphite can be identified on a dielectric substrate using a normal optical microscope. We investigate the mechanism behind the strong visibility of graphite, and we discuss the importance of substrates and of the microscope objective used for the imaging.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
248
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
248
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the G band Raman intensity of graphene sheets on a 300 nm SiO 2 /Si substrate as a function of the number of layers [40]. The number of layers of graphene sheets is determined by Raman and contrast spectroscopy [44,46,47]. In addition to the graphene sheets with one, two, three, five, six, eight, and nine layers, samples a h have more than 10 layers, with thickness in the range ~5 nm (sample a) to ~50 nm (sample h), as determined by AFM.…”
Section: Interference Enhancement Of Graphene On a Sio 2 /Si Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows the G band Raman intensity of graphene sheets on a 300 nm SiO 2 /Si substrate as a function of the number of layers [40]. The number of layers of graphene sheets is determined by Raman and contrast spectroscopy [44,46,47]. In addition to the graphene sheets with one, two, three, five, six, eight, and nine layers, samples a h have more than 10 layers, with thickness in the range ~5 nm (sample a) to ~50 nm (sample h), as determined by AFM.…”
Section: Interference Enhancement Of Graphene On a Sio 2 /Si Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-reflection/interference effects on contrast have been well documented in the literature but the multiple reflection of Raman signals has not [44,46,47]. By considering the multilayer interference of incident light as well as the multi-reflection of Raman signals in graphene/graphite based on Fresnel's equations, the above Raman results can be explained.…”
Section: Interference Enhancement Of Graphene On a Sio 2 /Si Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,[12][13][14] Recently, several routes have been proposed for improving the image contrast of graphene, such as narrow band illumination and selecting appropriate substrate, 12,14 and reflection and contrast spectroscopy was used for approximate identification of the number of graphene layers. 13 In contrast to a monochromatic light source, the use of white light allows rapidly sorting out graphene thickness regions because graphene with different ranges of thickness can exhibit different color bands that can be easily appreciated by the naked eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In contrast to a monochromatic light source, the use of white light allows rapidly sorting out graphene thickness regions because graphene with different ranges of thickness can exhibit different color bands that can be easily appreciated by the naked eye. 6 However, only marginal color difference between monolayer graphene and substrate and between graphenes with different layers was observed even for the well-accepted optimum substrate. 12 Moreover, the selection of appropriate substrate in white light needs an effective and reliable theoretical guide, although several groups have tried to elucidate the preferential SiO 2 thickness based on monochromatic contrast calculation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Microscopic pictures of electrodes prepared with different graphene materials: a SG, b CVDG and c rGO. In (A) and (B) the graphene can be visualized by the microscope due to the interference between reflection paths of the air-SiO 2 and SiO 2 -Si interface [24] the total electroactive area of each electrode. The effective surface area of the carbon disc electrode was calculated to be 2.9·10 6 , 2.6·10 6 μm 2 for rGO, 3.9·10 4 μm 2 , for CVDG, and 51 μm 2 for the SG electrode, respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterization Of Different Graphene Electmentioning
confidence: 99%