2003
DOI: 10.1080/01422410310001610419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of mass

Abstract: The quark-lepton mass problem and the ideas of mass protection are reviewed. The hierarchy problem and suggestions for its resolution, including Little Higgs models, are discussed. The Multiple Point Principle (MPP) is introduced and used within the Standard Model (SM) to predict the top quark and Higgs particle masses. Mass matrix ansätze are considered; in particular we discuss the lightest family mass generation model, in which all the quark mixing angles are successfully expressed in terms of simple expres… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) The origin of mass suggested in (b) is in conformity with the contemporary Higgs mechanism [8] (see e.g. one of recent reviews in [9]), in the sense that mass results from some massless charge in a viscous vacuum (this proposal), or alternatively from certain component moving in a certain field (Higgs mechanism). However apparently, the two proposals for the origin of mass are associated with two distinct schemes for particle formation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(c) The origin of mass suggested in (b) is in conformity with the contemporary Higgs mechanism [8] (see e.g. one of recent reviews in [9]), in the sense that mass results from some massless charge in a viscous vacuum (this proposal), or alternatively from certain component moving in a certain field (Higgs mechanism). However apparently, the two proposals for the origin of mass are associated with two distinct schemes for particle formation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The orientation of u  q is of a random nature as the result of the influences of environmental fields which being random. Let u  q be, until equation (9), along the Z-axis in a given time interval for the discussions below.…”
Section: Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the good accuracies achieved in the measured values indicate a genuine difference among them. Since the radius decrease by 0.01fm in going from 40 Ca to 48 Ca, it means that the addition of neutrons to calcium isotopes reduces the size of the charge distribution of the same 20 protons when neutron number is increased from 20 to 28. If we take the simple view that charges were distributed eventualy throughout the nuclear volume, the charge radius should have increased by 6% based on simple R = r 0 A 1/3 relation.…”
Section: Isotope Effect In Nuclear Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.9734 ± 0.0008 0.2196 ± 0.0020 0.0036 ± 0.0007 0.224 ± 0.016 0.96 ± 0.013 0.0412 ± 0.002 0.0077 ± 0.0014 0.0397 ± 0.0033 0.9992 ± 0.0002   (7) Due to the arbitrariness in the phases of the quark fields, the mixing matrix V CKM contains only one CP violating phase, which would be of order unity sin 2 δ CP ∼ 1 if the observed CP-violating phenomena is to be attributed largely to the CKM mechanism [23]. From solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillation data [24], we know the neutrino mass squared differences:…”
Section: Fermion Masses In the Smmentioning
confidence: 99%