1947
DOI: 10.1042/bj0410062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The oxidation of dithiols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that BAL has a destructive effect on some haematin compounds. Thus, Barron, Miller & Kalnitsky (1947) have shown that haemoglobin is destroyed by treatment with BAL in the presence of air, and, in the present investigation, it was found that myoglobin was similarly 24 I949 affected. This reaction is probably essentially the same as that between haemoglobin and another reducing agent, ascorbic acid, which has been studied in detail by Lemberg, Legge & Lockwood (1941).…”
Section: Later I949mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is known that BAL has a destructive effect on some haematin compounds. Thus, Barron, Miller & Kalnitsky (1947) have shown that haemoglobin is destroyed by treatment with BAL in the presence of air, and, in the present investigation, it was found that myoglobin was similarly 24 I949 affected. This reaction is probably essentially the same as that between haemoglobin and another reducing agent, ascorbic acid, which has been studied in detail by Lemberg, Legge & Lockwood (1941).…”
Section: Later I949mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The larger inhibition of the succinic dehydrogenase found with ascorbic acid compared with BAL may be due to the failure of ascorbic acid (Eo = 0-05 V., at pH 7-3, 300; Ball, 1937) to protect the SH groups of succinic dehydrogenase from oxidation by H202. BAL with an E' of -0-15 V. at pH 7-0 (Barron, Miller & Kalnitsky, 1947) is more favourably situated in this respect. The greater inhibition with cysteine is probably related to the more rapid oxidation of this compound which might be expected to behave in the same way as BAL, if a shorter time of reaction were used.…”
Section: Later I949mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) Thiol themselves are known to act potentially as radical scavengers, i.e., they are able to scavenge the free radicals which are responsible for the breakage in DNA. Since solutions of DTT and the like are known to be much more stable to air oxidation than glutathione, 5,6) i.e., in the production rate of radical DTT and the like are much slower than glutathione, the rate of scavenging radicals may be more rapid than the production rate of radicals at high concentrations of DTT and the like. 2) After the phage inactivation by DTT had occurred, active phage could be recovered by the addition of high concentrations of DTT to the inactivated phage solution (Fig.…”
Section: Phage Inactivation By Thiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%