2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The p-cones in dimension n≥ 3 are not homogeneous when p≠ 2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 25. [17] Let V be a finite-dimensional ordered vector space with a strictly convex homogeneous positive cone, then V is order isomorphic to a spin-factor, i.e. V ∼ = H⊕R where H is a real finite-dimensional Hilbert space with the order on H ⊕R given by (v, t) ≥ 0 ⇐⇒ t ≥ v 2 .…”
Section: Self-dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proposition 25. [17] Let V be a finite-dimensional ordered vector space with a strictly convex homogeneous positive cone, then V is order isomorphic to a spin-factor, i.e. V ∼ = H⊕R where H is a real finite-dimensional Hilbert space with the order on H ⊕R given by (v, t) ≥ 0 ⇐⇒ t ≥ v 2 .…”
Section: Self-dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, at this point we still cannot use the characterisation of rank 2 spaces from [17] as this classification only holds for finite-dimensional spaces. It is currently unclear whether the generalisation of this theorem to infinite-dimensional spaces holds, although it seems reasonable.…”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed in Section 1 of [6], an often overlooked point is that K * depends on ·, · . Accordingly, it is entirely plausible that a cone that is not self-dual under the Euclidean inner product might become self-dual if the inner product is chosen appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This state of affairs brings us to the case of the p-cones. Up until the recent articles [5,6], there was no rigorous proof that the p-cones L n+1 p were not symmetric when p = 2 and n ≥ 2. Now, although we know that L n+1 p is not homogeneous for p = 2 and n ≥ 2, it still remains to investigate whether L n+1 p could become self-dual under an appropriate inner product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%