2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00659.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of tie strength in customer relationships for innovation: a longitudinal case study in the sports industry

Abstract: Current literature argues that firms should have strong ties to customers to benefit from increased customer retention and loyalty. Strong ties, however, have also shown to prevent innovation, suggesting that firms should also develop weak ties to other customer groups. This paper focuses on the potential for strong ties to facilitate, rather than prohibit, innovation. It is based in a 7‐year longitudinal research project with Adidas, a global sporting goods company. From the case, we find that the paradox of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(157 reference statements)
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that of the control variables only market orientation is significantly related to product launch performance. This pattern for the control variables remains the same for all other models, confirming existing findings regarding ties with customers and product launch performance (Fredberg and Piller 2011). Next, we introduce the independent variables in a stepwise fashion, starting with the direct effects (Models 2 and 3) and continuing with the indirect effects (Model 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We see that of the control variables only market orientation is significantly related to product launch performance. This pattern for the control variables remains the same for all other models, confirming existing findings regarding ties with customers and product launch performance (Fredberg and Piller 2011). Next, we introduce the independent variables in a stepwise fashion, starting with the direct effects (Models 2 and 3) and continuing with the indirect effects (Model 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This desire is rooted in the natural need to be different from others in some way (Snyder and Fromkin, 1980). Mass customization toolkits empower consumers to develop individual innovative solutions (von Hippel and Katz, 2002;Piller and Walcher, 2006;Pr€ ugl and Schreier, 2006;Tran et al, 2010;Fredberg and Piller, 2011;F€ uller et al, 2011) and thus differentiate themselves from others and enjoy a feeling of uniqueness (Lynn and Snyder, 2002;Schreier, 2006). Perceived uniqueness is known to increase consumers' valuation of the customized product Merle et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the product category is affected by the levels of perceived empowerment and enjoyment as well (Füller et al, 2009), which determine consumers participation in new product development projects and vary according to the participants' product involvement and creativity. Prior research focused on a specific industry or product category, such as sports industry (Fredberg & Piller, 2011) or computer games (Prugl & Schreier, 2006). However, with the growth of the phenomenon across industries, there is a need to understand how different domains affect the consumer involvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%