2014
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2014.45051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Perceptual Span in Second Language Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study Using a Gaze-Contingent Moving Window Paradigm

Abstract: The perceptual span, which is the visual area providing useful information to a reader during eye fixation, has been well investigated among native or first language (L1) readers, but not among second language (L2) readers. Our goal was to investigate the size of the perceptual span among Japanese university students who learn English as a foreign language (EFL) to investigate parafoveal processing during L2 reading. In an experiment using the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm, we compared perceptual span… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chi et al [5] conducted the same experiment as Mc-Conkie and Rayner [19]. They used LCD in their experiment.…”
Section: Research Of Effective Visual Field Which Used "Window"mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chi et al [5] conducted the same experiment as Mc-Conkie and Rayner [19]. They used LCD in their experiment.…”
Section: Research Of Effective Visual Field Which Used "Window"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, some studies have used a window method of assessing second language reading [5] in addition to a multiresolution display [6]. Chi et al investigated the size of the perceptual span when reading English among Japanese university students who learned English as a foreign language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, related account involves allocation of visual attention during reading. The premise of the idea of moderating effects of word properties on first-fixation location for the upcoming word is that readers can preprocess part of the information from upcoming words in the parafovea (where visual acuity is lower than in the fovea; for review, see Rayner, 1998, 2009; Schotter et al, 2012) and that the extent of attention directed to upcoming words in the parafovea depends on reading skills (Rayner, 1986; Häikiö et al, 2009; Veldre and Andrews, 2014), reading speed (Rayner et al, 2010; Ashby et al, 2012; for L2 readers, see Leung et al, 2014), and exposure to target language (for bilingual and L2 readers, see Whitford and Titone, 2015). Based on this account, less skilled participants, who read more slowly (i.e., longer gaze duration) than more skilled ones, might have experienced difficulty utilizing information from longer words gathered in the parafovea in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R software [56], and specifically the lme4 library [57], has been utilized to fit the linear mixed effects hierarchical models of the relationship between our dependent variables and the explanatory factors. A chart outlining the analytical steps followed in the study is presented in Figure 1. alternative model including the additional parameters via LRT [54].…”
Section: Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%