Equilibrium activity ratios such as aK/(atJ,,+m)t may be determined by analysing a solution in equilibrium with a soil. The Q/I procedure is one method for establishing the composition of such a solution. Several approximations have been proposed to simplify this procedure or the necessary calculations. This paper reviews the main sources of error in the Q/I procedure.Errors may arise in the sampling, preparation, and storage of soil samples: it is best to analyse samples as soon as possible after sampling, with no preparation other than gentle sieving.The Q/I procedure rests on certain implicit assumptions which will not strictly apply if there is any substantial exchange, between exchangeable cations and soluble salts or microbially dissolved carbonates, during determinations. This paper demonstrates that such exchange does indeed occur during the determination of the equilibrium activity ratios of soils at 5 < pH > 6, but that the errors may be ignored in British soils at pH > 5. Modified interpolation procedures designed to minimize errors from these causes appear to introduce larger errors than they avoid.
ERRORS IN POTASSIUM ACTIVITY RATIOS
515ratios (ARF) by the Q/I procedure, and in the simplifying approximations to the full procedure.The Q/I procedure In the determination of ARK by the full Q/I method (Taylor, 1958; Beckett, 1964a) small replicate samples of soil are equilibrated with ali uots of a dilute CaC1, solution containing graded amounts of K, by equilibrium suspensions and analysed for K and (Ca+Mg). AK, the amount of K per unit weight of soil which has been lost or gained by the soil during equilibration, is calculated from the changes in comosition of each test solution. The final activity ratio of each solution sha 9, ing for short periods. Samples of solution are separated from the is calculated from its composition according to Country Malayat West Indies* Britain* Britain (K deficient)" Ireland* where square brackets are molar concentrations and 'f' are activit the value of ARF at AK = 0, is interpolated from a graph of AK against ARF. It is deemed to be the activity ratio of a solution which has not changed in composition on being added to the soil.TABLE I
Range of cation concentrations in the soil solutions of topsoils at jkld moisture contentscoefficients (subscript f refers to equilibrium or final solutions). A&, 2 K I Ca+Mg pH range m M -0.03-0.38 0'01-0.95 4.61.0 0.04-3.64 3-1-11.7 4'57' 1 0*20-2*60 7'0-54'7 4 ' 7 4 . 7 0*01-0.15 2.9-15.9 limed and 0.6-9.56 13.3-39.1 K-fertilized 5x6 P. MOSS AND P. H. T. BECKETT Anderson et al., 1942; Le Roux and Sumner, 1967). The solutions should not be so strong that the Ratio Law (Schofield, 1947) may not apply. Blanchet (1959a, b) recommends a subsidiary experiment to determine the Ca concentration. Most workers use solutions with Ca concentration in the range 0.002+-04~ and K/dCa ratio in the range o to 0.05 dM.Simplifications. The full procedure, and the calculations which follow, are more complicated than the routine analyses commonly used...