2022
DOI: 10.17899/on_ed.2022.13.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Planetary Justice Crisis, Structural Racism and Sustainability Education

Abstract: We follow two main arguments in our contribution: First, we contend that there is a vital need to connect theories around racism to discussions about the Planetary Ecological Crisis. This is a link that has hardly been addressed in German-speaking social science research on racism. And secondly, we argue for a critical engagement with the workings of racism within Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), an educational field with a strongly normative underpinning that (cl)aims to work for a “better future … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is still research that assumes technology is neutral and aims to identify "what works" in the implementation of new technology, there is now a large body of work that engages with the cultural, social, affective, economic and political implications of technological upheavals. This critical work has, however, rarely considered the planetary dimensions of edtech (with notable exceptions, e.g., Carstensen-Egwuom & Schröder, 2022;Grünberger, 2021;Piattoeva, 2021;Scherrer, 2022). A leading book on digitalisation and liberal arts education, for example, states:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is still research that assumes technology is neutral and aims to identify "what works" in the implementation of new technology, there is now a large body of work that engages with the cultural, social, affective, economic and political implications of technological upheavals. This critical work has, however, rarely considered the planetary dimensions of edtech (with notable exceptions, e.g., Carstensen-Egwuom & Schröder, 2022;Grünberger, 2021;Piattoeva, 2021;Scherrer, 2022). A leading book on digitalisation and liberal arts education, for example, states:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%