2000
DOI: 10.1080/713658731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The political economy of pro-market reforms in Bangladesh: Regime consolidation through economic liberalization?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fahimul Quadir (2000) attempts an explanation of the issue from a political economy perspective. He strongly argues that different regimes in Dhaka used pro-market economic reforms to ensure regime survival; reforms were never meant to accelerate growth or meet developmental challenges of Bangladesh.…”
Section: Competing Explanations About the Failure Of Private Sector-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fahimul Quadir (2000) attempts an explanation of the issue from a political economy perspective. He strongly argues that different regimes in Dhaka used pro-market economic reforms to ensure regime survival; reforms were never meant to accelerate growth or meet developmental challenges of Bangladesh.…”
Section: Competing Explanations About the Failure Of Private Sector-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of that, a pro-market economic policy was started in Bangladesh in December 1975 by the military junta, led by General Ziaur Rahman, overthrowing the post-independence socialist government (Nuruzzaman, 2004). His government attempted to build a coalition between dominant politico-economic groups, particularly civil military bureaucratic elites, businessmen, and industrialists (Quadir, 2000). The military regime of President…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these measures and a reasonable growth rate of the economy, the private sector has not been able to contribute substantially to poverty alleviation. Rather, its role has been handicapped by crises in its own governance as well as in the state structure (Choudhury, 2002;CPD, 2002;Quadir, 2000;Sobhan, 2002).…”
Section: Some Critical Observations On the Role Of The Private Sectormentioning
confidence: 97%