The Political Process of Bureaucratic Reform: Wonosobo Regional Government Experience from 2011-2015

Abstract

This study examines the political process of bureaucratic reform in Wonosobo regional government from 2011-2015. The article uses political and bureaucratic frameworks to describe the interplay of bureaucrats and politicians in the phases of bureaucratic reform. Data collection for this study employed document review and in-depth interviews with key informants. Results of the study show that the political process of bureaucratic reform mainly involved dialectical interactions between actors in the Wonosobo Regional Government and the Regional House of Representatives. The interplay of actors can then be explained through the actors’ configuration, issues that are confronted by the actors, conflicts of interest between actors, and influence tactics used by actors in managing issues and struggling for their interests. The experience of the Wonosobo regional government shows that bureaucratic reform does not only concern technical and administrative capacities in carrying out institutional arrangement, but it also involves political aspects namely visionary leadership, strong political will to conduct reform, and effective use of influential tactics to gain political supports for the reform.

Dynamics of Bureaucratic Neutrality Policy in Indonesia

“…Political officials' vision and mission must often be carried out and supported (Krisnajaya et al, 2019). Unfortunately, at the local government level, the structural positions under the regional head must be appointed based on a competency test and not merely on political considerations.…”

Examining the Indonesia Bureaucracy Response and Problem in Pandemic Times: A Preliminary Diagnostic Study

“…In Indonesia, bureaucratic reform is an essential component of efforts to improve bureaucratic performance, including central and regional government management (9). Theoretically-normatively, bureaucrats are being forced to shift from a rule-based bureaucracy to a performance-based one, which would eventually become a dynamic government.…”

Bureaucratic Neutrality Index in Direct Regional Head Elections: Optimism in Developing Professional Bureaucracy in Indonesia

“…The main concern of a neutral bureaucracy is providing satisfying public services and democratic public policies that benefit the general public (Rakhmawanto, 2016;Sutrisno, 2019). Political and bureaucratic officials must develop close cooperation in governmental affairs (Krisnajaya et al, 2019;Ramasamy, 2020). Such a situation is a complementary, in which political officials provide bureaucracy the opportunity to work professionally and independently, while political officials develop reasonable political influence to ensure that the bureaucracy works under the agreed work plan platform (Svara, 1999(Svara, , 2001(Svara, , 2006.…”