2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003022428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics and Science of Prevision

Abstract: This book inquires into the use of prediction at the intersection of politics and academia, and reflects upon the implications of future-oriented policy-making across different fields.The volume focuses on the key intricacies and fallacies of prevision in a time of complexity, uncertainty, and unpredictability. The first part of the book discusses different academic perspectives and contributions to future-oriented policy-making. The second part discusses the role of future knowledge in decision-making across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 271 publications
(340 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the scenarios have been imagined as much as a response to the pandemic as a means to progress out of it, there is greater value in considering where such scenarios might lead and what such exercises might mean. In particular, we draw on recent work on politics of future-making (Jasanoff, 2020, 2021) or as Wenger et al (2020) refer to it, the politics and science of prevision. In so doing we ask who should be involved in considering the Antarctic Other and how might multiple voices be represented in ways that consider standpoints in ethics, politics and law.…”
Section: Pressing Reset?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the scenarios have been imagined as much as a response to the pandemic as a means to progress out of it, there is greater value in considering where such scenarios might lead and what such exercises might mean. In particular, we draw on recent work on politics of future-making (Jasanoff, 2020, 2021) or as Wenger et al (2020) refer to it, the politics and science of prevision. In so doing we ask who should be involved in considering the Antarctic Other and how might multiple voices be represented in ways that consider standpoints in ethics, politics and law.…”
Section: Pressing Reset?mentioning
confidence: 99%