2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1207-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The position of Australopithecus sediba within fossil hominin hand use diversity

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of the TMc complex of Kebara 2 suggests mechanical advantage when loading a more abducted thumb (Fig. 4), in agreement with current trabecular evidence 51 , suggesting a morphology favoring the use of "pad-topad" grips. This result is consistent with that of Karakostis et al 16 in which the Kebara 2 entheseal morphology suggests habitual use of precision grips.…”
Section: Pls1supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The morphology of the TMc complex of Kebara 2 suggests mechanical advantage when loading a more abducted thumb (Fig. 4), in agreement with current trabecular evidence 51 , suggesting a morphology favoring the use of "pad-topad" grips. This result is consistent with that of Karakostis et al 16 in which the Kebara 2 entheseal morphology suggests habitual use of precision grips.…”
Section: Pls1supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Finally, our ontogenetic analysis addresses evolutionary morphology but we do not directly investigate functional morphology in fossil species, since this would require the use of specific comparative functional (e.g., locomotion) data. The incorporation of analyses of functional morphology could evaluate/test the functional significance of our findings following 3 potential avenues for future research: (a) Biomechanical 3D models applied on early hominin fossils 74 , 75 , (b) trabecular morphology, widely used in functional morphology studies 76 – 78 , and (c) refined analysis of 3D muscle attachment sites (entheses) 79 , considering supportive experimental evidence involving laboratory animals 80 , 81 . Our work opens up a new window for addressing all these issues in fossil hominins from the Gran Dolina site in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such bony markers of locomotor development could therefore be compared with other developmental milestones that track the overall pace of life history in fossil species. If the model presented in this paper holds up under longitudinal experimental conditions, trabecular structure can be used both to infer behavior from fossil morphology (Barak et al, 2013;Tsegai et al, 2013;Skinner et al, 2015;Kivell, 2016;Stephens et al, 2016;Bishop et al, 2018;Ryan et al, 2018;Sorrentino et al, 2019;Dunmore et al, 2020) and to serve as a valuable proxy for neuromuscular maturation and life history events like locomotor onset and the achievement of an adult-like gait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of spongy (trabecular) bone found inside bones is thought to be particularly responsive to mechanical stimuli Carter and Beaupré, 2001;Kivell, 2016). The link between mechanical loading and the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone allows locomotor and postural behavior to be reconstructed in fossil taxa (Ryan and Ketcham, 2002;Skinner et al, 2015;Kivell, 2016;Stephens et al, 2016;Zeininger et al, 2016;Bishop et al, 2018;Ryan et al, 2018;Bardo et al, 2020;Dunmore et al, 2020). To understand how variation in trabecular structure arises within and between species, it is imperative to understand how it forms during growth and development (Ryan and Krovitz, 2006;Gosman and Ketcham, 2009;Ryan et al, 2017;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%