2016
DOI: 10.5129/001041516819582937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Citizenship: How Immigrant Incorporation Affects Attitudes towards Social Benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with Kolbe and Crepaz (2016) that naturalization leads to increasing support for welfare state restrictiveness. However, we argue that self-interest could also be one of the mechanisms driving support for welfare state access, and self-interest operates not only through naturalization, but also in several other ways.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We agree with Kolbe and Crepaz (2016) that naturalization leads to increasing support for welfare state restrictiveness. However, we argue that self-interest could also be one of the mechanisms driving support for welfare state access, and self-interest operates not only through naturalization, but also in several other ways.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The authors furthermore argue that by becoming a citizen, immigrants change their collective identities and approximate the attitudes of the host society. Kolbe and Crepaz (2016) find support for these expectations in a cross-country analysis of ESS survey data.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kinship and solidarity probably also explain the lack of differences between citizens of foreign descent and immigrants in willingness to grant rights to immigrants. Respondents with an immigrant background may have had themselves or their relatives in mind as a reference point when answering to the question about rights (see however Kolbe & Crepaz, 2016). This was less likely the case when considering newcomers in Switzerland.…”
Section: Threat Perceptions Explain Differences In Prejudicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the foreign born, those possessing national citizenship expressed more exclusive views than immigrants. Also using ESS data, Kolbe and Crepaz (2016) found that foreign-born, naturalized citizens were less willing than immigrants to grant immigrants access to social benefits. In the same vein, Valentová and Berzosa (2012) revealed that, in Luxembourg, natives expressed the most negative attitudes toward established immigrants followed by second-generation and then firstgeneration immigrants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%